tRump

Yesterday, Trump posted the above

Now, I ask you: If you were in the Iranian regime, would you be: (1) frightened by this post or (2) relieved that you were finally causing Trump to melt down?

I’d guess (2). You’d see his post and figure that Trump — posting on Easter Sunday — has finally gone utterly and definitively bonkers. You’ve done it. He’s mad as a hatter.

I was bullied as a kid. The way I knew I was winning against the bullies was when they started to scream and swear and rant and rave at me. That’s when I knew they felt powerless. They’d done everything they could to beat me down, and yet they couldn’t. I was tougher than their fists. They went nuts.

Is there any other explanation for Trump’s outburst? Many of Trump’s posts are really intended for domestic consumption. Perhaps he wanted to sound tough for his American followers?

That’s unlikely. Just Wednesday night he told America that the U.S. doesn’t “need” the strait to be open. If we don’t need it open, why threaten to blow up Iranian power plants (most likely war crimes) if Iran doesn’t open it?

The easiest explanation is the simplest: Trump is cornered, and he’s going stark-raving mad.

No less an expert on the workings of Trump’s brain than Marjorie Taylor Greene had this to say about Trump’s post:

“Everyone in his administration that claims to be a Christian needs to fall on their knees and beg forgiveness from God and stop worshipping the President and intervene in Trump’s madness. I know all of you and him and he has gone insane, and all of you are complicit.”
I’ve never agreed with Marjorie Taylor Greene on anything, until today.

Sleep well.

Robert Reich


IRAN JUST OFFERED EUROPE A HORMUZ DEAL. YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY JUST TRIGGERED.


On the surface: Iran offered the EU transit access through the Strait of Hormuz. Sounds like a small diplomatic move. It is not.
This is a goddamn financial nuclear bomb.
💀 The Hormuz Strait carries 20% of ALL the world’s oil
💀 Europe’s energy bill jumped $16.2 BILLION in just 30 days
💀 Natural gas in Europe is up 100%. Oil up 60%. Diesel at $200/barrel
💀 Dollar reserves have already fallen from 70% to 56.9% in 25 years
⚠️ If Europe takes this deal, they pay in euros — not dollars
⚠️ One major non-dollar oil deal is all it takes to show the world it CAN be done
The petrodollar is the most powerful financial system ever created. Born in 1974. It forced every nation on Earth to hold dollars just to buy oil. That’s the entire basis of US financial dominance.
If that system cracks — BRICS accelerates, Gulf states reconsider, dollar demand collapses, and America can no longer fund its $34 trillion debt on easy terms.
ECB board member Panetta said it on April 2: “Even if the Iran war ends, the damage has been done.”
They’re showing you a war about nuclear weapons and regional security.
They’re NOT showing you that the REAL war is over who gets to print the world’s reserve currency.
→ Iran blocks Hormuz for the US. Opens it for EU with a deal.
→ EU, desperate and bleeding, seriously considers taking the deal.
→ Deal gets done in euros or yuan. Not dollars.
→ Every country watching — BRICS, Global South, Gulf states — sees it happen.
“If the EU can bypass the dollar, so can we.”
→ Dollar demand falls. Reserve share collapses. US inflation rises.
If America is so powerful, why is the EU considering a deal with the country America is bombing?
Complete silence.
This is no longer just a Middle East war.
This is a direct attack on the petrodollar. And the US.


Iran sent this photo of the two C-130 giant planes US destroyed

Sad that we have to get our news from others

 

Report: Downed US airman couldn’t make contact at first because he was concussed; US destroyed own rescue planes to avoid Iran taking them5 April 2026, 9:44 pm


A handout photo, provided by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps official website Sepah News on April 5, 2026, shows smoke billowing reportedly from the site of smashed US aircraft in central Iran.


Quoting unnamed, apparently Israeli sources, Channel 12 offers specific details of how the rescue of the second US F-15 crewmember played out, including high drama when the two main US rescue planes ($2,000,000 loss) got stuck in the sand and were blown up by American bombs.

The weapons systems officer was unconscious and lightly concussed from his landing, and therefore was unable to make initial contact with US forces after ejecting and landing in Iran on Friday morning, the report says.

At noon, Israel time, he made contact from the highest point he could find to avoid being captured.


He then walked 10-12 kilometers (6-7.5 miles), hid in a crevice, and on Friday night sent a specific location, the report says.

Israel refrained from attacking in that area and helped with specific intelligence, the sources said. This contradicts American accounts, which say Israel provided only general intelligence assistance.

Over Friday and Saturday, Israel was asked by the US to assist in ensuring air supremacy in the area, and attacked “relevant targets.”

Ahead of the rescue, the Americans took control of some kind of mini-airfield or agricultural field and secured it, according to the report. Two US C-130 planes with Little Bird helicopters landed there.

The helicopters then flew to extricate the crewman from his hiding place and returned with him, in “exhausted” condition, to the secured field.

When the aircraft were taking off, there was “real drama” when the C-130s got stuck in the sand and were unable to lift off. Three lighter aircraft were called in and they evacuated the crewman and the rest of the 90-strong rescue team, the report says.

US warplanes then blew up the C-130s, as later seen in Iranian propaganda pictures, so that they would not fall intact into Iranian hands.


China is dumping US dollars, buying gold.

China is dumping US dollars. That we’ve known for a long time, but now it’s entering a new phase. China is now taking a 10% loss on the sales, and that can only mean that China is getting ready to completely exit all of its USD assets so that it can’t become a hostage to seizure by the Americans or the EU.

Better to lose 10% than to lose 100%. Much like what happened to Russia when the Ukraine war started, the cash might become frozen. If China wants to work on Taiwan, then it’s guaranteed that these foreign assets will be frozen. It’s not buying other currency, it’s buying physical commodities, like gold, copper, lithium, etc.

In the meantime, the American vassals, er, allies are being forced to buy up the bonds that China is dumping, to keep the value of the USD high. Do you think China is getting ready to act on Taiwan, that’s why it’s dumping the US bonds?


Follow the Money

From Robert Reich:
Friends,

It’s important that we demonstrated against Trump’s assertion of royal powers.

It’s at least as important to follow the money — and learn the identities of America’s billionaire royalty who crowned Trump in the first place. They’re now spending another regal fortune to keep Congress under his control.

Today I’m going to name names.

As of March 1, according to a new report from Americans for Tax Fairness, the 50 biggest-spending billionaires in American politics had already contributed over $433 million to the upcoming midterm political campaigns.

Not surprisingly, 80 percent of this haul is in support of Republican candidates or conservative issue groups.

Given how early we are in the process, and how contributions tend to accelerate closer to Election Day, 2026 will almost surely set a new record for billionaire money in midterm elections. (Because of our current pathetically weak campaign finance laws, courtesy of the Supreme Court, fat-cat contributors are funneling huge sums through super PACs. While such spending is supposed to be independent of the campaign being supported, rules against coordination are now going largely unenforced.)

WHO THEY ARE

MUSK
The single biggest contributor is, of course, Elon Musk — the world’s richest person — who has plunked down almost $71 million into Republican midterm campaigns so far.

Musk contributed a total of $278 million in the 2024 election cycle, mostly for getting Trump reelected. His “investment” has paid off nicely. Musk’s net worth has grown 220 percent since Trump won in 2024.

Musk’s latest cash infusion to Republicans came after his short destructive stint as head of the “Department of Government Efficiency,” where he helped place his cronies into high-level positions throughout the federal government.

Yes, I know. Musk and Trump had a falling out. But since then both have realized they have more to gain as political partners. And now that Musk’s SpaceX satellite system is integral to Pete Hegseth’s Department of “War,” Musk has filed for an initial public offering, seeking a valuation over $2 trillion and potentially raising $75 billion, which would make it the largest IPO in history.

The New York Times reports that Musk participated in a phone call on Tuesday with Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India. Musk’s companies have taken on significant investment from sovereign wealth funds from Middle Eastern countries, including Saudi Arabia and Qatar, and he has long coveted a greater commercial presence in India.

YASS
Musk is followed in the billionaire-spending-on-politics sweepstakes by Wall Street financier Jeff Yass, who has contributed more than $55 million so far in this midterm election cycle. He’s donated $16 million to MAGA, Inc., Trump’s super PAC, dedicated to supporting candidates he backs.

The Yass donations came as Trump was deciding whether to delay the forced sale of the social media app TikTok, in which Yass was a major investor. Trump repeatedly delayed the sale, saving Yass’s lucrative investment.

In addition, Yass has donated $10 million apiece to the anti-tax Club for Growth PAC; to another PAC that wants to drain funds from public schools to support private ones; and to a PAC that supports the political ambitions of former Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy. Yass has also donated $7.5 million to a PAC dedicated to supporting House members of (and House candidates aspiring to belong to) the radical-right Freedom Caucus.

BROCKMAN
In third place is San Francisco AI tech mogul Greg Brockman, who has given $25 million in midterm money so far — mostly to Trump’s super PAC, presumably because Brockman wants to dismantle state-level AI regulations through federal preemptive action and thinks Trump will help him.

As president of OpenAI, Brockman recently agreed to let the Pentagon use his company’s AI technology — which his competitor Anthropic publicly refused to do over concerns about mass surveillance and autonomous weapons.

UIHLEIN
Packaging titan Dick Uihlein has long been a major donor to right-wing candidates and causes. (Among the beneficiaries of his largesse have been many politicians who denied Donald Trump’s loss to Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election.)

The biggest recipients of Uihlein midterm money so far are two super PACs for which Uihlein and his wife are the principal backers: $5 million to Restoration of America, supporting conservative political candidates; and $3.5 million to Fair Courts America, which the Uihleins founded to support conservative candidates for judicial office.

SCHWARZMAN
Private equity mogul Stephen Schwarzman has long been a major Republican Party megadonor. As CEO of the giant investment management company Blackstone, Schwarzman has built a career on predatory business practices and disregard for the public good, while leveraging his immense wealth to rig the system in his favor.

So far in the midterms, Schwarzman has spent: $5 million for Trump’s super PAC; $5 million for the Republican Senate Leadership Fund; $1 million for the Republican Congressional Leadership Fund; and $1 million to a super PAC exclusively backing Republican Senate Whip John Cornyn.

***

As we approach the 250th anniversary of our independence from the British monarchy, it’s more important than ever to commit ourselves to getting big money out of American politics.

As I’ve noted, here’s a potential way to do this without waiting for the Supreme Court to reverse its Citizens United decision or amending the Constitution. Another is through small-donor financing. The two aren’t mutually exclusive; indeed, we should push for both.

Billionaires are not singularly responsible for corrupting our system of government, of course — and not all billionaires are doing this.

But as wealth continues to concentrate at the top, America finds itself in a doom loop in which giant campaign donations from the super-rich buy political decisions that make them even richer.

This doom loop is the power behind the throne on which Trump (shits) sits.


Last fall, Donald Trump signed a terrifying new order called NPSM-7, directing federal law-enforcement agencies to investigate progressive activist organizations as “domestic terrorists.”

Now the Trump regime has scored its first conviction under NSPM-7.

A Fort Worth, Texas, jury just convicted eight anti-ICE protestors for providing “material support for terrorism” because — and I swear we’re not making this up — they wore black to a protest.”

The Incident: Prosecutors characterized the July 4, 2025 event not as a peaceful protest but as an ambush, alleging defendants were dressed in black tactical gear and used coordinated tactics to assault federal agents.

Evidence and Accusations: Reports indicate evidence included evidence of a planned attack, with allegations that suspects used fireworks, and had weapons, body armor, and signal jammers. One individual was also convicted of attempted murder.

Legal Precedent: This case was heavily scrutinized as a potential turning point for using federal anti-terrorism statutes against domestic activists. The Guardian The Guardian +6 The defendants, identified in some reports as Song, Autumn Hill, Zachary Evetts, Savanna Batten, Megan Morris, Maricela Rueda, Elizabeth Soto, and Ines Soto, face up to 15 years in prison on the material support count.

The assault must not have been bad because no one was hurt.

Trump issued an executive order, declaring Antifa a domestic terror organization, and a Presidential memorandum, directing federal resources to investigate and disrupt financial networks that fund left-wing domestic terrorism. During a roundtable on Antifa, which featured a mixture of conservative influencers and government officials, then Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem called Antifa “just as dangerous” as Hamas, Hezbollah, and ISIS. In November, prosecutors released a new indictment that referred to the Prairieland defendants as “operatives” in a “North Texas Antifa Cell” and added the charge of material support to terrorists.
 
The Prairieland case was billed as the federal government’s first indictment of a purported Antifa cell. Earlier this month, nine defendants were found guilty of various charges, eight of them for providing material support for terrorism. (Song was also convicted of attempted murder.) “Today’s verdict on terrorism charges will not be the last as the Trump Administration systematically dismantles Antifa and finally halts their violence on America’s streets,” Attorney General Pam Bondi said of the convictions.

tRump’s administration has collected “the largest fee fraud in the history of the American immigration system.”

Trump’s administration has collected the largest fee fraud in the history of the American immigration system,” saying this occurred because of his various travel bans and other anti-immigrant policies.

“The State Department is actively instructing consular officers NOT to tell applicants they’re banned, even as those applicants pay fees and attend interviews,” “The government is cashing those checks and then doing nothing. That’s fraud not delay.”

“The people said trade officials in the Commerce Department and U.S. trade representatives believed the tariffs were hurting consumers by raising prices for goods” 



This Was the Moment Donald Trump Lost His Mojo


He’s forgotten the thing that first got him elected: more daycare, no cuts to Medicare or other programs.


Jonathan Cohn
Apr 05, 2026

 


Donald Trump on April 1, 2026


DONALD TRUMP LAST WEEK gave an unexpectedly low key but  candid riff on his governing priorities—and, in the process, revealed that he’s losing one of his most important political skills.

It happened on Wednesday, during a private Easter luncheon at the White House. Here’s what Trump said:

“We’re fighting wars, we can’t take care of daycare. You’ve got to let a state take care of daycare, and they should pay for it, too. They should pay—they’ll have to raise their taxes, but they should pay for it. And we could lower our taxes a little bit to them, to make up for—but we—it’s not possible for us to take care of daycare, Medicaid, Medicare, all these individual things. They can do it on a state basis. You can’t do it on a federal [basis]. We have to take care of one thing: military protection. We have to guard the country.”

Typically, Republican leaders try very hard to deny they are starving social programs to fund the military, leaving Democrats to make the case on their own. Yet here was Trump coming right out and saying it. And while the president frequently blurts out statements that have no bearing on reality, in this case his description of how he’d like to rearrange federal spending priorities was pretty much on the nose.

In fact, just two days after he made those remarks, his administration released its budget for fiscal year 2027. It envisions a $1.5 trillion increase for defense, then proposes to offset that cost with a 10 percent reduction in domestic spending. Among the casualties would be a program that helps low-income Americans pay for heating and cooling—yes, right at a time when electricity prices are on the rise.

Not that it takes a new budget to see Trump’s priorities in action. It’s been less than a year since he worked with Republicans to pass historic cuts to Medicaid and food assistance, while refusing to extend Affordable Care Act subsidies holding down insurance premiums for more than 20 million people.

None of this has been popular. Most Americans are opposed to the Iran war, according to polling, just as most Americans opposed the Medicaid cuts and wanted to see those “Obamacare” subsidies stay in place. That’s going to hurt in the midterms, as my Bulwark colleague Catherine Rampell observed last week.

But Wednesday’s riff and the governing record it matches threaten to undermine Trump’s appeal in another, more fundamental way—one that requires thinking back to 2015 when he was first seeking the Republican presidential nomination.

IT’S BEEN A WHILE—more than ten years!—so it’s easy to forget the extent to which Trump presented himself as a different kind of Republican, one who was willing to buck his own party’s establishment.

A lot of this was about trade, war, and immigration—how, as Trump told it, Republican elites had bankrupted the country with foreign interventions and sold out working Americans by shipping jobs over to China, all while allowing the country to be overrun with dangerous immigrants stealing everyday jobs. But Trump went out of his way to say he disagreed with the GOP establishment on matters of the welfare state as well.

“I’m not going to cut Social Security like every other Republican and I’m not going to cut Medicare or Medicaid,” he told the Daily Signal in 2015, making a promise he’d repeat many times over the course of the campaign.

And while Trump from day one was pledging to repeal the Affordable Care Act, he repeatedly told audiences, interviewers, and anybody else who would listen that he would replace it with something better, so nobody had to go without health care.

“Everybody’s got to be covered,” Trump told 60 Minutes in 2015, adding, “This is an un-Republican thing for me.”

Trump, in making this pitch, sounded a lot like a political archetype familiar in Europe, where some right-leaning parties have long opposed immigration while supporting government programs that provide generous health care, childcare, and other benefits. There’s even a term in the political science literature for this type of appeal: “welfare chauvinism.”

But anybody following Trump closely had good reason to question whether his pledges would translate to actual policy. His campaign rarely released formal policy proposals, and when they did they were comically devoid of details. During debates, he served up gobbledygook. Word got around that (as Trump more or less admitted) he strongly preferred memos keep to no more than a single page, preferably with graphs and visual cues, suggesting he was either uninterested or uninformed or both—and that, in office, he’d defer to congressional leaders who were precisely the old-style Republicans he said he was rejecting.

Which is just what happened, especially during his first year in office. Trump embraced congressional plans to repeal the Affordable Care Act that would have wreaked havoc with coverage for tens of millions of people, slashing Medicaid and private insurance subsidies to pay for tax cuts that disproportionately benefited corporations and the wealthiest Americans. And while he didn’t succeed on repeal, he did get the tax cut.

Through it all, however, Trump talked a good game on standing by the welfare state, including during the 2018 midterm campaign when he accused Democrats of attacking the big entitlement programs. “They’re going to hurt your Social Security so badly, and they’re killing you on Medicare,” he declared at one rally. “Just remember that. I’m going to protect your Social Security.”

Trump also made a high-profile effort to show he was prepared to help families dealing with the strains of work and raising children, most memorably in 2019 when he convened a White House summit on the subject. “With more women working today than ever before, we now have a historic opportunity to enact long-overdue reforms,” Trump said. “It’s time to pass paid family leave and expand access to quality childcare.”

THAT CHILDCARE AND PAID LEAVE EFFORT was supposed to be led by Trump’s eldest daughter, Ivanka, who back then was both a visible administration spokesperson and a regular presence in the West Wing. But it never got a real push from the White House.

Ivanka isn’t part of this new Trump administration, and neither is warm presidential rhetoric about providing struggling parents with help getting time off or paying for childcare. In fact, it’s hard to think of a single meaningful thing Trump has said on the subject—except those comments this past Wednesday, when Trump said the federal government couldn’t afford it.

Probably the closest Trump has come to channeling his first-term self on social welfare has been when he talks about prescription drug prices. He has put a lot of energy into negotiating deals with pharmaceutical manufacturers that—in the White House’s telling—are right now producing dramatic drops in the prices of prescription drugs.2 But the savings are mostly illusory, and hardly enough to offset the big price hikes for the more than 20 million Americans who had been getting assistance from those lapsed Affordable Care Act subsidies.

And that effect is hitting already. New data compiled from HealthInsurance.org shows that 10 percent of people who bought insurance this year shifted from “silver” to less generous “bronze” plans, almost certainly because they couldn’t keep up with rising premiums. That’s on top of people who are just eating the cost increases, or going uninsured altogether.

Whether that registers politically is a separate question. It depends on whether voters link their hardship to decisions that Trump and his Republican allies have made, which depends in part on whether Democrats can show the link exists. But Trump’s daycare riff on Wednesday makes that easy. Democrats can just run ads playing his remarks, verbatim.

The president gave them a gift. The one who occupied the Oval Office ten years ago never would have made that mistake.

Although snippets of video from Trump’s comments are easy to find online, the full video of the event he was speaking at does not appear on the White House homepage or YouTube channel. It turns out that Trump’s staff took down the video—reportedly because at one point Paula White, his spiritual adviser, compared him to Jesus.

Trump on Thursday announced new tariffs that would apply to the drug companies yet to reach deals with the administration. But it’s not clear what impact they will have. 


Easter was banned in early America.

Public worship at Plymouth by the Pilgrims


Author Michael Nordine
March 26, 2026

“They for whom all days are holy can have no holiday,” the Puritans liked to say, which helps explain why Easter was banned in the Massachusetts Bay Colony. (It also wasn’t widely celebrated in other parts of colonial America, including Jamestown, where it was observed with little fanfare.) The Bible didn’t mention holidays, the Puritans reasoned, so even one like Easter — which commemorates the resurrection of Jesus Christ and is perhaps the holiest day in all Christianity — was verboten.

The Puritans likened such celebrations to paganism, to which they wanted to remove all references. Christmas was banned alongside Easter in 1659 in Massachusetts, with the law stating that people caught observing the holidays “either by forbearing of labour, feasting, or any other way … shall pay for every such offence five shillings, as a fine to the county.”

The Puritans first arrived in New England in the early 17th century, settling around what’s now Boston. They believed that only “the elect” would be chosen for salvation and that most people would be damned, leading them to be as stringent as possible in their religious practices. Because Easter is always observed on a Sunday, banning it caused a problem for preachers delivering sermons on what would have been Easter Sunday — a pickle often solved by simply talking about something else


The no celebrations (Easter, Christmas, birthdays, etc.) is still practiced by some, including my daughter’s husband. I was brought up to believe only 144,000 people were going to heaven and I strived to become one of them by reading the Bible four times, cover to cover. But that only uncovered many doubts!

tRump claims to be a Christian, but he is not

Besides Christianity is based upon an older religion Zoroastrianism !

The most important people in religion could be named Jesus Christ, Muhammad,  or the Buddha. But there is an important religious thinker from a very remote time who is the basis on the fundamental beliefs of all the major western religions. This is Zarathustra (Zoroaster to the Greeks). He was a mystic, poet, and revolutionary living in ancient Persia (modern Iran) between 1500-1000 BC. When he lived there was much chaos in the world, with many gods (polytheism), and many sacrifices made to these gods as well as by humans due to the fate of existence being controlled by the god of fate. The world being created and controlled by many gods and randomness was not what Zoroaster was talking about, and he came up with an incredibly different view of the world.

He was able to describe a single Supreme God who had created everything, and Zoroaster offered the existence of a cosmic war between good and evil. He also discussed a place for the good in heaven and the bad in hell. He spoke about a future time when all mankind would be judged and punished for their actions, a messiah would come to save mankind, and there would be a resurrection from the dead.

The ideas of Zoroaster were to become the core beliefs of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. The staggering number of similarities, which can be found in the Gathas (Zoroastrian hymns) and those that developed in the Abrahamic religions, illustrate the emergence of universal spiritual ideas throughout time and across cultures.

Persia, the home of the most powerful religious thinker of all time. His central idea (the absolute requirement of personal moral responsibility) is a very viable practical philosophy.

The One and the Two

Prior to Zoroaster’s time, the ancient Iranian religion was closely aligned with the Vedic religion found in India. The ancient Iranian religion represented a world filled with gods (daevas), complex rituals, and a realization that the universe actually operated based solely on the forces of nature, rather than upon moral forces.

According to legend, at age 30 Zoroaster experienced a mystical experience when he was taken into the presence of Ahura Mazda, the “Lord of All Wisdom.” During this experience, Zoroaster came to understand that Ahura Mazda was not simply another god among many; rather, he was the only uncreated, ultimate Creator of the universe. He was completely good, completely just, and completely light-giving.

However, this led to another philosophical problem: If the Creator was wholly good, what is the origin of evil? Zoroaster’s response to this question was profound and revolutionary. He developed the idea of cosmic dualism. The opposite of Ahura Mazda, he taught, was an independent, destructive being called Angra Mainyu (later called Ahriman). Angra Mainyu was the catalyst behind darkness, decay, disease, and deception.

Thus, evil was born. For the first time in history, evil has been identified as an immensely intelligent force acting to destroy God’s creation, not just a natural force, nor just a manifestation of a whimsical god’s emotions.

The Cosmic Battle and the Power of Choice

According to Zoroaster’s version, the universe as a whole is in a continuous battle between Light (Ahura Mazda) and Darkness (Angra Mainyu). But Zoroaster’s belief is that, since Ahura Mazda created us, we are not to be passive victims of this battle; rather, we are to be active partners with Ahura Mazda.

Zoroaster taught that all human beings possess free will and therefore are not beholden to predestined fate or to the whims of the gods. Every day, every hour, every minute, and every second, we are confronted with the choice to support either the forces of Light or the forces of Darkness. Simply stated, the most basic idea of Zoroastrianism is that we must always choose:

“Good Thoughts, Good Words, Good Deeds”

(Humata, Hukhta, Hvarshta)

By making positive moral decisions to choose truth over lies, construct kindness instead of cruelty, or create as opposed to destroy etc., you are giving power to the side of Light and aiding Ahura Mazda in winning the battle.

This creates an opportunity for humans to elevate their lives to a level of universal significance. Each human being’s choice is of great importance, as their moral choices are connected to their assistive participation in redeeming the universe.

   

The Babylonian Connection: A Convergence of Ideas

How was it possible for the teachings of an ancient Persian prophet to have so much in common with the teachings of both Judaism and Christianity? One of the major historical times when these two disparate cultures crossed paths was when a new nation arose in Babylon: the Babylonian exile. During the Babylonian Exile in 586 B.C.E., the Babylonians were victorious over the city of Jerusalem (destroying the First Temple) and took many of the Jewish leaders into captivity in Babylon. Fifty years later, the Persian King Cyrus the Great conquered Babylon and released the Jews at that time by permitting them to return to Jerusalem to rebuild their temple.

When Jewish scholars and priests lived within the borders of the Persian Empire, they were also living very close to the Persian people and their Zoroastrian beliefs and practices. Prior to the Babylonian exile, most of what we define as early Jewish texts/Scriptures were not preoccupied with cosmic adversary or fiery hell, but rather viewed the afterlife as an unknown and therefore, a lowly space, called Sheol, a shadowy realm.

Following the Babylonian Exile, during the Second Temple Period, Jews became increasingly concerned with the theological tenets that would have parallels to those of Zoroastrianism. Satan’s role in Jewish theology changed from being a prosecutor in the heavenly court (Book of Job) to serving as a cosmic adversary of God. Many of the major theological themes (final judgment, resurrection from death, separation of souls into heaven and hell) became core to the Jewish understanding during this time.

Many scholars do not see these theological developments as a simple process of copying from one culture to another, but rather as a profound convergence. The presence of Zoroastrianism may have acted as a catalyst or common language that allowed Jewish thinkers at that time to better understand/clarify and adapt their present understanding of spiritual truths that were already emerging within their own tradition. These important concepts of moral choice, divine justice and ultimate redemption have found their fullest development in Christianity and Islam.

Three Zoroastrian Practices for Modern Life

Zoroaster’s teachings offer a powerful, action-oriented philosophy for living with purpose and integrity today. Here are three ways to apply his wisdom:

1. The Daily Alignment (Good Thoughts, Good Words, Good Deeds):

When you wake up in the morning, make an effort to create a mental connection with the forces of Creation. Then make a commitment to yourself that you will do your best to have good thoughts, good words, and good deeds today. When you have to make a decision, think about how this will affect your life and ask yourself if it is constructive or destructive. Ask yourself if it is true or false. By focusing on these three basic forms of morality, you establish a set of guidelines for how to live during the day.

2. The Rejection of Fate:

When Zoroaster refused to accept the determinism of the world, he declared that people are not at the mercy of fate. Therefore, he believed in free will and that every person has the power to control their own life. While we cannot control events in our lives, we can control how we respond to them. Many of us live our lives as passive participants. To live your life as an active participant, reclaim your power and become an active creator of your own life.

3. The Practice of Light:

Fire and light are the ultimate symbols of purity and wisdom from Ahura Mazda. You can use fire and light to create a small home ritual. When you use a candle to help light your way in the dark, you are not just creating a visual effect. It is also a reminder of the presence of truth and goodness. You can also use the candle to reflect on the moral choices you have made during the day and as a commitment to make more moral choices tomorrow.

The Ultimate Triumph

According to Zoroaster, while there will be a cosmic conflict that lasts until the end of time; he also predicted that there would be a time when the Light would prevail over Evil (Angra Mainyu) and all darkness would cease to exist, and the world would one day return to its original state which is known as Frashokereti (making wonderful). The victory of the Forces of Light does not rest solely on God’s promises but is dependent upon the participation of mankind through courage and action.

For over three thousand years, Zoroaster has offered mankind his teachings and a challenge to each individual. His teachings serve as both a historical record and an appeal for all individuals to accept the responsibility of fighting evil and doing their part in bringing heaven to earth. The battle between good and evil exists in every human being as a battle for the heart, and as every decision affects this battle, each person has the power to contribute to bring about the victory of good over evil.


 

Trump’s new budget proposal is historic — in one of the worst ways possible

By Bobby Kogan

On Friday, the Trump administration submitted its annual budget request to Congress. The document called for dramatically reducing what the United States government does for Americans. The budget called for steep cuts to funding for education, housing and health, funneling resources toward the military as the war in Iran reaches its fifth week. This shift would leave the portion of the budget known as “nondefense discretionary,” or NDD funding, which accounts for most domestic activities aside from Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and SNAP, at its lowest level since at least Dwight D. Eisenhower’s presidency.

When Trump signed the “big, beautiful bill” last July, he enacted the largest cuts to Medicaid and SNAP in history. The same law provided enormous tax cuts that disproportionately further enriched the very rich. Taken together, it instituted the largest transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich in a single law in U.S. history. The new budget proposal would double down on his legacy of cutting programs that ordinary Americans, and especially those already struggling to make ends meet, rely on.

Budgets are always partially aspirational, but every other president in my lifetime has tried to keep at least most of the discretionary part of their budget requests within reality, specifically to influence the outcome. Trump is not doing that.


April 3, 2026

Hegseth Has Been Quietly Purging Black and Women Officers Across the Entire Military
By now you’ve heard that Pete Hegseth fired the Army’s top general this week and replaced him with his personal aide. What you may not have heard is that the firing was just the most visible piece of a much larger operation.

Hegseth has taken steps to block or delay promotions for more than a dozen Black and women senior officers across all four branches of the military. The officers have been targeted because of their race, gender, or perceived affiliation with Biden administration policies, according to nine U.S. officials familiar with the process.

This isn’t one branch, one list, or one bad week. As one of those officials put it: “There is not a single service that has been immune to this level of involvement by Hegseth.”

A list of naval officers selected to be promoted to one-star admiral has been sitting on Hegseth’s desk for more than a month, with officials expressing concern that some of those officers could be removed because of their race or gender. None are under investigation. Their branch recommended them. Hegseth just won’t sign off.

When former Army Chief Gen. Randy George asked to meet with Hegseth specifically to discuss the promotion blocks, Hegseth refused to meet or discuss his decisions. George was fired this week without explanation.

Pete Hegseth declared war on DEI so the military could finally reward the most qualified. The most qualified person he found to lead the entire United States Army was, it turns out, the guy who used to carry his bags.

 

The Pastors Who Helped Elect Trump Are Watching Their Churches Empty Out
Evangelicals turned out for Trump in historic numbers. They prayed at his inauguration. Some of their leaders were photographed laying hands on him in the Oval Office. And now, in congregations across the country, the pews are emptying.

Not because people lost their faith. Because they’re afraid to leave their homes.

Amid ICE arrests and detentions, attendance has dropped and churches have closed. In some immigrant-heavy congregations, church attendance has dropped between 35 and 70 percent as parishioners fear leaving their homes amid enforcement activity.

One of the largest Latino churches in one state, which previously held four Sunday services, is now down to one, at roughly 60 percent capacity. Pastors across the country have told reporters the same story. A Latino evangelical leader put it as plainly as it can be put: “You’re deporting the future of American Christianity.”

The administration says it’s only targeting dangerous criminals. The pastors say their dangerous criminals were running the bake sale and hadn’t missed a Sunday in twenty years. Someone is lying and it’s not the people holding the casserole dishes.

Trump Paid a French Company a Billion Dollars to Not Build Wind Farms
After having lost every single court case over its attempt to halt East Coast offshore wind projects, the Trump administration announced it will simply pay one of the companies roughly $1 billion to abandon ship.

The company is France’s TotalEnergies. In exchange for walking away from planned wind farms off the coasts of New York and North Carolina, TotalEnergies will redirect that billion dollars into oil and gas development in Texas, including a liquefied natural gas export facility in Brownsville.

Together, the two abandoned projects could have generated enough electricity to power nearly one million homes. The Interior Department called this an “innovative agreement.” Environmental groups had a different name for it.

One group described it as a “billion-dollar bribe” to kill clean energy, saying that after losing again and again in court, Trump had found another way to strangle offshore wind: pay them to walk away.

Trump’s personal hatred of offshore wind reportedly dates back to a wind farm built near his golf course in Scotland that he found unsightly. A billion dollars of taxpayer money, redirected to a French oil company, to protect the view from a golf course. Truly, a government that works for the people.


April 2, 2026
Heather Cox Richardson
Apr 3


This afternoon, President Donald J. Trump posted on social media a video of the theme song of the Davy Crockett TV series from 1954–1955 starring Fess Parker. Over the clip, he wrote: “Davy Crockett, obviously a distant relative of Jasmine Crockett, and a very High IQ Frontiersman, would be proud of the legacy that he began long ago, and especially Jasmine’s Great Success as a Politician from the Great State of Texas! President DONALD J. TRUMP”

The Walt Disney Studio designed the Davy Crockett western series for children when Trump was about nine, an age that put him in the right demographic to have been part of the Davy Crockett craze that put “The Ballad of Davy Crockett” at the top of the Hit Parade and spurred the sale of $300 million of Davy Crockett merchandise as little boys begged their parents for raccoon caps that would make them look like a western hero.

Jasmine Crockett is a current Democratic U.S. representative from Texas. There is no evidence she is related to David Crockett, who served as a U.S. representative from Tennessee from 1827 to 1835 and who died at the Battle of the Alamo in 1836. Trump mused about their possible relationship before, in 2025.

It feels frighteningly appropriate for a 1950s television western to seem more important to Trump right now than the real world of April 2026 does. Davy Crockett was only one of the many westerns on television in the 1950s and 1960s as those eager to dismantle the New Deal government championed the idea of the western hero as the true American. Trump is trying to bring to life a right-wing political fantasy of the 1950s, and Americans in the present are making clear they reject it.

After World War II, Republican businessmen, southern racists, and religious traditionalists hated the government that both Democrats and Republicans had embraced since 1933, one that leveled the American social and economic playing field by regulating business, providing a basic social safety net, promoting infrastructure, and protecting civil rights. They insisted that such a system of government action was socialism or even communism, and contrasted it with their fantasy of an independent white man on the frontier who wanted nothing of the government but to be left alone.

In 1960 a ghost-written book released under the name of Arizona senator Barry Goldwater, who wore a cowboy hat and boasted of his family’s ties to the Old West although he himself grew up with a live-in maid and a chauffeur, articulated this right-wing vision.

The Conscience of a Conservative maintained that even if Americans liked the new government that had stabilized the country since the Great Depression and World War II, the Constitution’s framers had deliberately written a document that would prevent “the tyranny of the masses.”

In place of a strong federal government, the book said, power should go back to the states to restore true freedom to Black Americans, farmers, and workers. Federal action had given those groups too much power, and they were using it to destroy liberty and lower the American standard of living. In their hands, the book said, the U.S. was on its way to becoming a totalitarian state. At the same time, the government must protect the country with an increasingly strong military.

At an Easter lunch reception yesterday, Trump echoed this argument precisely. “I said to [Office of Management and Budget director] Russell [Vought], ‘Don’t send any money for daycare because the United States can’t take care of daycare,’” he said. “That has to be up to a state. We can’t take care of daycare. We’re a big country. We have fifty states, we have all these other people. We’re fighting wars. We can’t take care of daycare. You gotta let a state take care of daycare, and they should pay for it, too. They should pay. They’ll have to raise their taxes, but they should pay for it. And we could lower our taxes a little bit to them to make up, but we, it’s not possible for us to take care of daycare. Medicaid, Medicare, all these individual things, they can do it on a state basis. You can’t do it on a federal. We have to take care of one thing, military protection.”

Trump is expected to release his 2027 budget plan tomorrow, in time to use it to shape Republicans’ argument for the midterm elections in November. Like Trump’s budget requests for 2026, it calls for an enormous boost to the nation’s military spending, $1.5 trillion, to be paid for with cuts to domestic programs. But members of Congress recognized that domestic spending is popular, and their 2026 appropriations bills kept domestic spending relatively flat.

The popular pressure to fund domestic programs showed today when House speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) backpedaled on the Senate’s plan to fund the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) without funding Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the parent agency for Border Patrol, Customs and Border Protection. Far-right House Republicans opposed the Senate’s bill, and bowing to them, Johnson called the Senate’s bill “a joke” and sent House members home until April 13 without voting on it. Today Johnson said he would bring the bill forward to pass it with Democratic support and that Republicans would then try to fund ICE and Customs and Border Protection through a budget reconciliation measure that does not need Democratic votes.

Racism was central to the rhetoric of cowboy individualism, and the institutionalization of that racism in the mass deportations and incarcerations of the Department of Homeland Security under Trump has created a backlash. A poll last week by the Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) shows that only 35% of Americans approve of Trump’s handling of immigration while 61% disapprove.

An analysis of DHS records by Ali Winston and Maddy Varner of Wired revealed today that DHS has used agents from special units accustomed to dealing with high-risk warrants, armed drug cartels, and manhunts for civilian immigration sweeps. Agents from Border Patrol Tactical Unit (BORTAC) and its sister unit, Border Patrol Search, Trauma, and Rescue (BORSTAR), are part of what the journalists call “a secretive, tightly knit world” in which their identities “are typically excluded from official documents and shielded from public records requests.”

The journalists’ analysis shows that these agents are “as a group, the most violent of the hundreds of federal agents deployed to Chicago.” Following the use-of-force guidelines rewritten by former leader Gregory Bovino—himself a member of BORTAC—their use of force there “included punching and kicking protesters, throwing tear gas, macing civilians, firing pepperballs and 40-mm foam rounds into crowds, shocking people with tasers, unleashing dogs on deportation targets, and shooting unarmed civilians, killing at least one of them [Silverio Villegas González, shot at “close range” as he fled from officers after a traffic stop].

The county medical examiner yesterday declared the death of Nurul Amin Shah Alam, a visually impaired Rohingya refugee from Myanmar whom Border Patrol agents dropped off in the parking lot of a coffee shop on a frigid February night in Buffalo, New York, a homicide. Rather than releasing him to his family or lawyer, CBP officers offered Shah Alam what they called a “courtesy ride.” He was found dead five days after agents left him at the closed shop.

A DHS spokesperson told Sydney Carruth of MS NOW that the homicide ruling was “another hoax being peddled by the media and sanctuary politicians to demonize our law enforcement. This death had NOTHING to do with Border Patrol.”

Those who oppose government social welfare programs, regulation of business, and so on, have worked to concentrate power in the president, knowing that Congress will hesitate to slash programs their voters like. Yesterday Assistant Attorney General T. Elliot Gaiser, of the Office of Legal Counsel, published an opinion for the White House that claims the Presidential Records Act, which requires that presidents keep records of their official business and turn them over at the end of their term, is unconstitutional. Gaiser clerked for Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito.

“The PRA is not a valid exercise of Congress’s Article I authority and unconstitutionally intrudes on the independence and autonomy of the President guaranteed by Article II. The Act establishes a permanent and burdensome regime of congressional regulation of the Presidency untethered from any valid and identifiable legislative purpose,” the memo reads. “For these reasons, the PRA is unconstitutional, and the President need not further comply with its dictates.

The fallout from that concentration of power is showing now in Trump’s disastrous adventure in Iran, undertaking to attack the country without consultation either with Congress or with allies.

Yesterday evening, Trump commandeered time from television networks to deliver what officials billed as a major announcement on the Iran war. But rather than announce anything new in his first address to the nation about a war that has gone on now for more than a month, Trump rambled for 19 minutes, reiterating what he has put in social media posts. He said the war was almost over but also that military operations were going to intensify, said its purpose was to destroy Iran’s nuclear capabilities—despite his claim in June 2025 to have obliterated those capabilities—and said the rise in oil and gas prices would be only a “short-term increase.”

Sounding tired and speaking in a monotone, Trump reiterated his claim that the U.S. doesn’t need the oil that travels through the Strait of Hormuz and demanded that other nations who need the oil more force Iran to reopen it. In reality, the U.S. is tied into international oil markets, and prices not only of oil, but also of products that use oil to get to market, are already rising.

One Republican strategist from a battleground state texted Lisa Kashinsky and Alec Hernandez of Politico: “What the hell did he just say?” The strategist called the speech “nonsense.

As Trump spoke, U.S. stock futures plummeted, erasing about $550 billion in 25 minutes.

Today forty nations, led by Britain and France, discussed ways in which they could work to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The United States was not invited to participate.

In the midst of this crisis, the tension between the Army’s leadership and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth blew up today when Hegeseth fired Army Chief of Staff General Randy George. The Army chief of staff is the highest-ranking officer in the U.S. Army, the top military advisor for the Secretary of the Army, overseeing planning, training, and policy. George was appointed to his position in 2023 and worked closely with former defense secretary Lloyd J. Austin III, the four-star general who preceded Hegseth. Recently, George refused to remove four officers—two women and two Black men—from a promotion list at Hegseth’s insistence.

A source who spoke to Jennifer Jacobs, Eleanor Watson, and James LaPorta of CBS News said that Hegseth “wants someone in the role who will implement President Trump and Hegseth’s vision for the Army.” Two other Army leaders were also removed: General David Hodne, leader of the Army’s Transformation and Training Command, and Major General William Green, head of the Army’s Chaplain Corps. Hegseth has reworked the Chaplain Corps recently to limit the range of religious instruction available to military personnel.

And finally, Trump today fired Attorney General Pam Bondi by posting her dismissal on social media. He was apparently angry that she has not adequately punished his enemies and that her botched handling of the Epstein files has stoked rather than calmed the story. For the present, her replacement will be Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, who was Trump’s personal lawyer before joining the Department of Justice.

It was Blanche who met privately with Jeffrey Epstein’s associate, convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, last July, as the outcry over the Department of Justice’s apparent cover-up of the Epstein files grew. After their meeting, Maxwell was moved from the prison where she was being held in Florida, to a less restrictive, minimum-security federal prison camp in Texas.

Pointing to the Iran war’s cost, Trump abandons his pre-election promises about day care


“We’re fighting wars, we can’t take care of day care,” the president said. Trump touted a very different position in the run-up to Election Day 2024.


Apr. 2, 2026, 9:59 AM EDT
By
Steve Benen
During Donald Trump’s remarks at an Easter lunch reception at the White House, the president wasn’t asked for his position on helping American families cover the costs of day care, but he took some time to pontificate on the subject anyway.

“I said to [Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought], ‘Don’t send any money for day care, because the United States can’t take care of day care.’ That has to be up to a state,” the Republican said. “We can’t take care of day care. We’re a big country. We have 50 states. We have all these other people. We’re fighting wars, we can’t take care of day care. You got to let a state take care of day care, and they should pay for it, too. They should pay.”


He went on to say that it’s just “not possible” for the federal government to help defray the cost of day care, adding, “You can’t do it on a federal. We have to take care of one thing: military protection. We have to guard the country.”

Taken at face value, the rhetoric probably didn’t strike many observers as surprising. The setting might have been unusual, but that Trump made the case for investing in wars instead of day care at an Easter Lunch reception is largely consistent with the president’s MO.

It is, however, worth taking a brief stroll down memory lane and looking back at the run-up to the 2024 presidential election.
In September 2024, for example, Trump fielded questions at the Economic Club of New York, and one voter asked what he could do to help address the cost of child care. He began by describing it as a “very important issue,” and said specifically of day care, “In this country, you have to have it.”

As part of that exchange, Trump appeared to suggest that he expected his trade tariffs to generate so much revenue that it could help cover day care costs. “As much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers we’ll be taking in,” he concluded.

A month later, with early voting underway across most of the country, Trump also participated in a town hall event on Fox News with an audience made up entirely of women voters, one of whom talked about how difficult it was for her family to afford day care costs.

The candidate conceded that the existing system is “really not fair” and pledged to help families cover debilitating child care costs if elected to a second term.

That was just a few weeks before Election Day — when the Republican candidate was still talking about “putting America first” and avoiding costly foreign interventions. Seventeen months later, Trump hasn’t just forgotten about those assurances, he’s also turned his ostensible priorities inside out.


The Iranians I have known have all been outstanding people.

Iran’s response to tRump:

tRump on his rant:

“Conservatives have long warned that unchecked birthright citizenship fuels chain migration, strains resources, and rewards lawbreaking“.

Lets see, his wives and their relatives.

His multiple lawbreaking convictions.

Who is he to criticize or belittle?


From a friend:

Trump must be the world’s worst gunslinger. Every time he takes aim at a target, he shoots himself in the foot.

Scenario

  1. Your neighbor is being threatened by someone, You go to help.
  2. Your neighbor without provocation  gets his gun and heads out to kill someone.

Do you have to go get your gun and help him terrorize another?

Trump and Hegseth are mad at NATO and other countries not helping us terrorize Iran and kill people there. Trump just needs any excuse to stop sending money to NATO. Trump needs to be GONE!

 

Trump Threatens Jaw-Dropping Revenge Against Allies Who Humiliated Him

The president’s explosive comments came ahead of an address to the nation.
Ewan Palmer
Apr. 1 2026  

Donald Trump has floated the possibility of pulling the U.S. out of NATO as countries in the military alliance refuse to join in the Iran war.

Speaking to the British newspaper The Telegraph, the 79-year-old president accused NATO of being a “paper tiger” for not helping the U.S. in the Middle East conflict or reopening the Strait of Hormuz and said U.S. membership will not just be “reconsidered” but is “beyond reconsideration.” “I was never swayed by NATO. I always knew they were a paper tiger, and [Vladimir] Putin knows that too, by the way,” Trump said.


Donald Trump has also called NATO countries that do not help with the war in Iran “cowards.”

Tensions between Trump and the rest of NATO escalated this week after Italy refused to allow American bombers to use the country’s military base enroute to the Middle East.

France has blocked Israeli planes from flying weapons through its airspace, while Spain said it would close its airspace to American aircraft involved in military operations and would not allow the U.S. to use its military bases for the war.

Speaking to The Telegraph, Trump said he believes that NATO helping the U.S. in conflicts should be “automatic,” even though NATO is intended to be a defensive alliance and therefore has no real need to assist Trump with his war in Iran.

“We’ve been there automatically, including Ukraine. Ukraine wasn’t our problem,” Trump said. “It was a test, and we were there for them, and we would always have been there for them. They weren’t there for us.”

Speaking to Fox News on Tuesday night, Secretary of State Marco Rubio also suggested that the U.S. will need to “re-examine” its position with NATO when the Iran war ends, as several countries refuse to help Trump in the Middle East conflict.

“Unfortunately, we are going to have to re-examine whether or not this alliance that has served this country well for a while is still serving that purpose, or if it has now become a one-way street where America is simply in a position to defend Europe, but when we need the help of our allies, they’re going to deny us basing rights and overflight,” Rubio told Fox News’ Sean Hannity.


“I think these are very legitimate questions that we need to be asking.”

NATO has firmly stated it has no intention of getting dragged into the war in Iran since it broke out on Feb. 28.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio looks on during a meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump and President of Argentina
Marco Rubio claimed that the U.S. is “very, very close to achieving our objectives” in Iran.

Trump also lashed out at top U.S. allies such as the U.K. and France on Tuesday for not helping end the Strait of Hormuz crisis he is responsible for starting.

In an unhinged Truth Social post, the 79-year-old president suggested countries affected by the oil crisis stemming from the closure of the shipping route should “build up some delayed courage, go to the Strait, and just TAKE IT.”


“You’ll have to start learning how to fight for yourself. The U.S.A. won’t be there to help you anymore, just like you weren’t there for us. Iran has been, essentially, decimated. The hard part is done. Go get your own oil!” Trump added.

 

 


Plastic is the hidden cost of the war in Iran
By
Julian Torres

 May 19, 2025.
Experts are warning that consumers will see a rise in prices for a variety of plastic consumer goods due to the war with Iran.
Plastic products are partly made out of oil, which has gone up more than 40% since the start of the war in late February. As a result, products like disposable cutlery, bottled drinks and garbage bags could be among the first to rise in the coming weeks, said Patrick Penfield, a professor of supply chain practice at Syracuse University.

But plastics are used across supply chains, from packaging to manufacturing, meaning it can be difficult to pinpoint exactly where the costs come from in a product’s final price tag.

“It’s one of those things where you shake your head at the store. You don’t know if it’s more expensive due to general inflation, rising rents, but you are paying for this,” Joseph Foudy, a professor of economics at the NYU Stern School of Business, told CNN.

Higher packaging costs may drive up food prices in two to four months as companies work through existing inventory, Penfield said. 

Why plastic prices are rising
Behind these increases are rising oil and natural gas prices, which have surged in part because of the Iranian threat to shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. The waterway plays a critical role in global energy and petrochemical supply chains.

The strait is a conduit for a fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas supply.

Since the war began, crude oil has risen from $67 a barrel to above $98 at its peak on March 20, while benchmark natural gas prices in Asia and Europe have jumped more than 60% in the same period.

Over 99% of global plastics are derived from fossil fuels, according to the Center for International Environmental Law.

That means higher energy prices don’t just raise manufacturing costs, but also the cost of the materials themselves. That includes polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene, two of the world’s most widely used plastics.

Low-density polyethylene resin pellets at a factory in Klang, in Malaysia’s Selangor state, on October 9, 2024.
Low-density polyethylene resin pellets at a factory in Klang, in Malaysia’s Selangor state, on October 9, 2024. Mohd Rasfan/AFP/Getty Images
The Middle East is a major supplier of plastic raw materials. The region accounts for roughly a quarter of global polyethylene and polypropylene exports, according to S&P Global Energy data.

“Approximately 84% of Middle East PE capacity relies on the strait for waterborne exports,” Harrison Jacoby, director of polyethylene at Independent Commodity Intelligence Services, a global chemical and energy information provider, told CNN.

Prices for plastic resins have already surged by double digits across most manufacturing categories in the past 30 days, according to the Plastics Exchange, an independent clearinghouse that tracks transaction data for the resin market.

“In my 25 years (in the plastics industry), I’ve never before seen a (monthly) PE increase this large,” said Michael Greenberg, CEO of the Plastics Exchange and its market intelligence platform, Resintel.

Few alternatives
Plastics are deeply embedded across industries, from packaging and construction to auto manufacturing and healthcare. Switching to alternatives made from paper or glass is often expensive and time-consuming, requiring changes across entire manufacturing processes.

In the short term, “there are not a lot of substitutes for plastics,” Foudy said.

Packaging companies are more likely to adjust existing designs and use thinner plastics or make them less expensive, Penfield noted.

Products made mostly of plastic, like trash bags, are likely to see sharper price increases compared to more complex goods like automobiles, where plastic is just one of many inputs.

But if high oil prices are sustained for even three or four months, consumers can expect to pay higher prices for potentially another year or two, Foudy added.

“Even if the war ended tomorrow, there’s still going to be a fairly long amount of time before the (plastic) supply chain normalizes itself,” Greenberg said.


A new investigation has backed up evidence given by a woman who has accused Donald Trump of sexually abusing her when she was 13, according to a report.

The woman conducted four interviews with the FBI in 2019 in which she detailed alleged abuse by Trump and child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Her interviews referencing Trump were initially withheld by the Department of Justice.


Erkki Forster
NEW YORK, NY – MAY 18: 
A report from South Carolina newspaper The Post and Courier released on Sunday has now corroborated key personal details given by the woman about a third man she claims also sexually assaulted her—named Jimmy Atkins. Those details are not directly related to her accusations against Trump, but suggest that she was truthful about other matters she raised with the FBI.

Dementia?

Trump posted 10 times (all at 10 PM 3-29-26) that the DOJ targeted New York AG Letitia James because she insured both of her houses!

Bank fraud charges against James were dismissed late last year, and a grand jury in Virginia later refused to re-indict her.


Trump is Russian Agent

Many nations offered to send oil to Cuba, but Trump said no, he blockaded Cuba to force them to change the regime.

U.S. President Donald Trump has effectively blocked ​all oil shipments to Cuba in an attempt to pressure the government in Havana.

Separately, the U.S. temporarily eased sanctions on Russia to help improve the flow of oil that has been restricted by the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran.
In the ​meantime, the Russian ship  Anatoly Kolodkin has been making its way to Cuba. The vessel departed from Russia’s ​Primorsk port carrying some 650,000 barrels of crude, LSEG ship-monitoring data also showed.

But now there is an exception, Russia is going to be allowed to sell oil to Cuba!


Karolying Leavitt thinks we had a regime change in Iran.

“Has it not? Their entire leadership has been killed. Wouldn’t you say there’s been a change in the regime”?

We made the regime worse.

We swapped out an 86-year-old hardline leader for a young hardline leader.

Regime change is NOT swapping out names.

It’s changing the goals, values, principles, laws and governance.


listen to Trump tell you what the Declaration of Independence means.

Trump:

of course you have the Declaration of Independence

Moran: What does it mean to you?

Trump:

Well, it means exactly what it says. It’s a declaration. It’s a declaration of unity and love. Respect, and it means a lot. And it’s something very special.


Hegseth injects combative Christianity into America’s military

by Ellen Mitchell – 03/29/26

During his briefing on the Iran war last week, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth suggested that Americans take a knee and pray to Jesus for the success of U.S. forces in the Middle East. A few days later, he read out a sermon praying that “wicked souls” be “delivered to the eternal damnation” in the fight against Iran.

 

Trump said bitcoins were bad for the country, until he figured out he could make tons of money off of the coins – which are used to move money stealthily by criminals.

 

On Jan. 15, 2026, French President Emmanuel Macron said France was now providing two-thirds of Ukraine’s intelligence.

Ukrainian intelligence officials suspected the U.S. had leaked information to Russia, causing Ukraine to stop sharing intelligence with the U.S.

Shortly after, a rumor gained traction that Ukraine relied so heavily on French intelligence because Ukraine had allegedly given the U.S. false intelligence that the U.S. then leaked to Russia, uncovering the U.S. as an unreliable intelligence partner for Ukraine.

Pentagon prepares for weeks of ground operations in Iran, officials say, as thousands of U.S. troops arrive in Middle East


If President Donald Trump approves the plans, such an effort would mark a new phase of the war that could be significantly more dangerous to U.S. personnel than the first four weeks. Any potential ground operation would fall short of a full-scale invasion and could instead involve raids by a mixture of Special Operations forces and conventional infantry troops, said the officials.

 

Trump announces, in a speech , that he will no longer support NATO members. Who didn’t see that coming? And, could it get any sillier, he wants to rename the strait of Hormuz the Trump strait?


Trump accidentally sabotaged his own party


REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz
John Stoehr March 28, 2026

The Democrats in the Congress held the line and won. So far, that’s the story of the fight over the shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

The Republicans said no to two proposals for weeks, during which time airports nationwide descended into chaos. Employees at the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) were working without pay.

The mess was getting so messy that last weekend, Senate Republicans went to the president with a deal. The Democrats would fund all of DHS but not ICE. Airports would return to normal. The GOP would get a chance to secure ICE funding later. But Donald Trump said no. He said he would agree if the Democrats supported unrelated legislation called the SAVE Act.

But the president didn’t stop there with his unrealistic demands. To create what he believed was leverage over the Democrats, he dispatched ICE agents to airports around the country. It was reported that they were “assisting” the TSA, but in reality, Trump was trying to bully the Democrats, especially Chuck Schumer, into giving him everything he wanted.

Senate Democrats made clear their intention to restore order at airports by funding all of DHS, except for ICE.

 

Kremlin has outlawed the “ideology of childlessness.”

As Russian men die off and Russian women give birth less often, the country faces a “demographic crisis,” so the Kremlin has outlawed the “ideology of childlessness.” Russia’s Health Ministry has approved updated guidelines for doctors:

The women’s edition of a medical-history questionnaire should inquire into the patient’s reproductive plans. And if she isn’t planning to reproduce, the guidelines say, she should be sent to therapy “for the purpose of fostering positive attitudes toward childbirth.”

(AC/Moscow Times, London Times) …If Russian women don’t have kids, who is Putin going to send to die in Ukraine 18 years from now?

high price of gasoline

Economists say the high price of gasoline is because refineries base their pricing for gasoline on the cost to replace their inventory of foreign crude (Despite producing significant amounts of light sweet crude, many U.S. refineries are traditionally configured for heavier, more sour imported crude), so costs for gas stations go up immediately. But when the price of oil drops, they don’t lower the cost of their gasoline until they have refined all the sour crude they have already purchased.

This often leads to accusations of price gouging — not just from you but from lawmakers, too. But legislation to combat that has failed in the past because of “concerns they will discourage U.S. firms from ramping up production when it’s needed most, further constricting supply and leading to even greater shortages.”

Gas prices are expected to continue climbing over the next few days, and consumer sentiment is falling, The Post reported yesterday. The global benchmark price for a barrel of crude oil was above $112 yesterday — up 50 percent from last month.


Houthis enter missile fray as Israel hits nuke sites

2026-03-28 HKT 16:32

Iranian media reported Israeli strikes on Friday on three Iranian nuclear facilities and two steel plants, with officials saying there was no radioactive release.

Gulf countries and Israel came under missile fire and Israeli forces struck Iran’s nuclear sites on Saturday as the Middle East conflict raged into a second month.

In a sign that the conflict may be expanding further, Israel’s military said air defenses responded to a missile launched from Yemen – the first since the start of the war on February 28 and after threats from Iran’s Houthi allies to launch attacks.

The conflict, which began a month ago to the day, showed no sign of ending, with Israel announcing fresh strikes on Tehran and reports of around 10 intense blasts and a plume of black smoke.

Emirati authorities said debris from a missile interception started fires at an Abu Dhabi industrial zone, injuring five Indian nationals.

Saudi Arabia said it had intercepted a missile and several drones, and Bahrain said a blaze caused by the “Iranian aggression” had been brought under control.

In Israel, repeated air raid sirens sent people to shelters, including in Tel Aviv where a man was killed and two others wounded, and in the country’s north, where media reported a simultaneous attack from Iran and its Lebanese ally Hezbollah.

An Iranian missile and drone attack on the Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia wounded at least 12 American soldiers, two of them seriously, according to The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal, citing unidentified officials.

G7 foreign ministers, meeting near Paris, expressed the “absolute necessity to permanently restore safe and toll-free freedom of navigation” in the Strait of Hormuz, which has been in a state of near closure as a result of Iranian and called for “an immediate cessation of attacks against civilians and civilian infrastructure”.

Israel confirmed it had struck the Khondab heavy water complex and a uranium processing plant in Ardakan, while the UN nuclear watchdog said Iran had informed it of another strike on the Bushehr nuclear power plant.

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi threatened retaliation “for Israeli crimes” in a post on X, saying the attacks contradicted Trump’s “extended deadline for diplomacy” while the country’s Revolutionary Guards warned they would strike industrial sites across the region, having earlier issued similar warnings for US military bases and hotels hosting American troops.

Yemen’s Houthi rebels had warned on Friday they would join the war if US-Israeli attacks on ally Iran continued or if more countries joined the conflict.

The Houthis have in the past attacked shipping in the Red Sea in response to regional conflicts, but had so far not intervened in the latest war. “We affirm that our fingers are on the trigger for direct military intervention,” the group said in a statement. (AFP)

Update: Israel’s military said it intercepted a missile launched from Yemen toward Israel early Saturday, the first time it had faced fire from that country. The Iranian-backed Houthi rebels claimed responsibility for the attack, which calls into question whether the rebel group backed by Tehran will again target commercial shipping traveling through the Red Sea corridor.


Hello, Boomer? It’s me, Zoomer!

Haters like to say Gen Z can’t make phone calls, but a very wholesome phone experiment is forging friendships between Zoomers and Boomers living thousands of miles apart. Researchers recently stuck a payphone on the street near Boston University, no doubt confusing Gen Z students who’d never seen one in the wild. There’s only one number this phone dials, and it connects to a Nevada nursing home. Total strangers can pick up the phone and start chatting with someone 50 years their senior. What a lovely way to bridge generational divides and teach the youths about extinct methods of telecommunication.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/20/us/video/call-a-boomer-to-fight-loneliness-digvid-vrtc

England

It has been announced that the Future Homes Standard (FHS) will mandate that most new homes built from 2028 must include on-site renewable energy generation as standard.

While it has been on the cards for some time, the government has now published details of its FHS, moving new regulatory requirements from policy into implementation.

Under the FHS, all new homes – with some exceptions such as high-rise buildings – must include on-site renewables, mainly rooftop solar, along with low-carbon heating such as heat pumps and heat networks.

This higher standard for new homes will come into force from 2028, a year later than anticipated.

 

“If this policy is to succeed, the focus must go beyond what is installed in homes to how the grid is operated. Making better use of existing infrastructure through active voltage control can reduce bills and unlock capacity, while improving flexibility and resilience. Scaling clean power will only work if the network beneath it is ready to support it.”

Diabetes: There’s an app for that

Sam Glassenberg’s daughter was diagnosed with diabetes when she was 5, and Glassenberg felt totally unprepared for the whirlwind of medical information he’d need to internalize to keep her healthy. So he turned diabetes management into a game, literally, with “Level One,” a video game he designed that looks like “Candy Crush” but teaches players of all ages how to manage their diagnosis. Who knew it was possible to gamify dosing insulin and tracking ketones? It’s worked so far for Glassenberg’s daughter, who’s now 11 and thriving.

Even as a Stanford-trained computer science engineer, Glassenberg found it confusing and frustrating, especially with the high stakes involved.

“It’s ridiculous,” he said. “It’s horrible because for those first few months, you’re learning through play, but that play is trial-and-error on your own kid.”

So, he did what game designers do best. He built a video game — called “Level One: A Diabetes Game” — a free mobile app that has had about 50,000 downloads since its launch last April.


Meet Moon Mascot ‘Rise,’ the zero-g indicator for NASA’s Artemis II mission

In its “Missions” blog, NASA explains that zero gravity indicators are plush items that are small and provide a visual indication of when the spacecraft and its crew reach space. Submitted by a 2nd grader.

https://www.wapt.com/article/moon-mascot-rise-artemis-ii-zero-g-indicator/70871597

Abbreviations

Even everyday abbreviations may boggle the mind: For example, why is “pound” abbreviated as “lb”? Maybe you memorized the term in school, or maybe one day you asked the deli manager what that “LB” on the sticker meant, but it’s not an easy one to decipher on its own, because the word and its abbreviation don’t share a single letter. There is an answer as to why it’s shortened that way, though, and it dates back to ancient Rome.

The Romans used a basic unit of weight called a libra (~0.722 pounds), derived from the Latin for “scale” or “balance.” Libra pondo is a Latin phrase that translates to “a pound by weight.” When these terms reached Britain, they became the standard for weighing gold and silver. The abbreviation “lb” is a shortening of libra that was carried over to the English word “pound.” The British currency is also called the pound, and the £ symbol represents libra.

Another concept worth mentioning is the Roman uncia, a Latin word that translates to “one-twelfth.” It was used by the Romans as a unit of measurement for one-twelfth of a libra, and it became the inspiration for the English word “ounce.” So, where did that “z” in the abbreviation “oz” come from? On the journey from Latin to English, there was a detour with the Italian word onza.


President Donald Trump is toying with renaming one of the world’s most critical shipping routes after—who else—himself.

Speaking at an investor forum in Miami on Friday night, Trump casually referred to the Strait of Hormuz as the “Strait of Trump,” before quickly correcting himself, then insisting it wasn’t a slip.

“Excuse me, I’m so sorry. Such a terrible mistake,” he told the crowd.

Donald Trump stands on stage at a lecture with his arms stretched out.
Speaking at an investor forum in Miami on Friday, Trump casually referred to the Strait of Hormuz as the “Strait of Trump.”

“The Fake News will say, ‘He accidentally said.’ No, there’s no accidents with me.

The remark drew laughs in the room, but behind the scenes, it’s not entirely a joke.

Trump has reportedly privately floated renaming the waterway the “Strait of America,” or even after himself, if the U.S. succeeds in wresting control of it from Iran, according to The New York Post.


Moscow Goes (Digitally) Dark

Russia has suffered hundreds of thousands of casualties since Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, and lost much of its influence in the region. This month, the capital went weeks without Internet

By Andrew Ryvkin
March 28, 2026

Moskvichka, a lifestyle publication run by one of the Kremlin’s most notorious propagandists, Kristina Potupchik, just published a review of Ava, a new restaurant overlooking Red Square that serves crab doughnuts, a scallop-and-strawberry salad, and a white-chocolate-and-sour-cream cake wrapped in edible gold. What the magazine failed to mention is that the view from Ava has changed drastically in the last couple of weeks.

F.S.O. (Russia’s secret service) officers in full military gear are stationed around the Kremlin. A masked gunman is perched on Lenin’s tomb. First-time diners who have trouble finding the restaurant will have to ask directions from the drivers of armored cars and pickups with mounted guns that have recently appeared on every road leading to the Kremlin. Because, for three weeks, the Russian capital has had no mobile Internet or G.P.S. Here, Google Maps—along with every other app that needs an Internet connection—is nothing but a blank screen.

 

Ironically, Russia’s command-and-control structures suffered a massive blow when SpaceX turned off the country’s Starlink terminals and the Kremlin blocked Telegram, which its troops used to coordinate. Even the Ministry of Defense considers Max an insecure means of communication for the military, and there’s talk of unblocking Telegram on the front lines only.

Having seen the president of Venezuela captured and the supreme leader of Iran killed, Vladimir Putin feels anything but safe.
Putin’s personal paranoia may also be a major factor. The F.S.O. is, essentially, an army created to protect one man. Its assets are stationed specifically to defend the Kremlin and Putin’s many dachas, and the security perimeter around these sites keeps expanding; Putin’s Black Sea residence now has a two-mile no-go zone around it. Having seen the leader of Venezuela captured and the leader of Iran killed, Putin feels anything but safe—even with the U.S. offering Russia major concessions to end the war in Ukraine.

 


Heather Cox Richardson
Mar 27, 2026
In an interview with Reuters on Monday, Singapore’s minister for foreign affairs, Dr. Vivian Balakrishnan, put in bald language the change in the world order instigated by President Donald J. Trump.

“For 80 years,” Balakrishnan explained, “the US was the underwriter for a system of globalisation based on UN Charter principles, multilateralism, territorial integrity, sovereign equality.” That system “heralded an unprecedented and unique period of global prosperity and peace. Of course there were exceptions. And of course, the Cold War was still in effect for at least half of the last 80 years. But generally, for those of us who were non-communists, who ran open economies, who provided first world infrastructure, together with a hardworking disciplined people, we had unprecedented opportunities.

“The story of Singapore, with a per capita GDP of 500 US dollars in 1965. Now, [it is] somewhere between 80,000 to 90,000 US dollars. It would not have happened if it had not been for this unprecedented period, basically Pax Americana and then turbocharged by the reform and opening of China for decades. It has been unprecedented. It has been great for many of us. In fact, I will say, for all of us, if you look back 80 years.

“But now, whether you like it or not, objectively, this period has ended…. Basically, the underwriter of this world order has now become a revisionist power, and some people would even say a disruptor. But the larger point is that the erosion of norms, processes, and institutions that underpinned a remarkable period of peace and prosperity; that foundation has gone.”

In its place, as scholar of authoritarianism Timothy Snyder said to me in a YouTube conversation yesterday, Trump is aligning himself with international oligarchs like Russia’s Vladimir Putin, Hungary’s Viktor Orbán, Saudi Arabia’s Mohammad bin Salman (MBS), and China’s Xi Jinping. Because of his position as the president of the United States of America, this means he is aligning the United States of America with this oligarchical axis as well, abandoning the country’s democratic principles and traditional allies.

 

The fallout from the Iran war has also benefited Russia’s Vladimir Putin. Despite reports that Russia is aiding Iran in the fight, the Trump administration dropped sanctions on Russian oil that was already at sea, giving Russia an injection of up to $10 billion a month into its cash-strapped war effort against Ukraine.

Today Trump reposted Russian propaganda claiming that Ukraine discussed funneling money to Biden’s reelection campaign. Also today, four Russian lawmakers arrived in Washington, D.C., for the first such visit since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022 to talk with lawmakers and officials, “part of the normalization of relations with the United States of America,” as one of the Russians told the Russian press.

Trump declared he was determined to achieve peace between Russia and Ukraine, but this week, according to Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky, administration officials said the U.S. would not guarantee Ukraine’s security unless Ukraine withdraws from its own land in Donbas. Ceding the region to Russia would essentially give Putin what he launched the war to grab. It is the same region that was at stake in 2016, when Russian operatives told Trump’s 2016 campaign manager they would help Trump’s presidential candidacy if he would look the other way as Putin installed a puppet over the region.

This afternoon, Noah Robertson and Ellen Francis of the Washington Post reported that the Pentagon is considering diverting weapons intended for Ukraine to the Middle East. They also noted that on Monday, Pentagon officials told Congress that it was going to divert about $750 million in funding provided by NATO countries for Ukraine to restock military weapons in the U.S. instead. About allocating weapons, Trump told the reporters, “we do that all the time. We have them in other countries, like in Germany and all over Europe. Sometimes we take from one and we use for another.”

Last week, the U.S. eased sanctions on banks in Russia’s ally Belarus, and today Trump announced he would ease further sanctions on Belarus to try to get fertilizer into the U.S. since Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz has stopped the transportation of about 20% of the world’s fertilizer. Also today, Belarus’s president Alexander Lukashenko signed a treaty with another of Putin’s allies, North Korea’s president Kim Jong Un, announcing a “fundamentally new stage” of the relationship between the two countries as they “oppose undue pressure on Belarus from the West.” Both Belarus and North Korea support Russia in its war on Ukraine.

Trump has openly endorsed Orbán for reelection in Hungary’s April 12 elections, posting on social media yesterday: “Relations between Hungary and the United States have reached new heights of cooperation and spectacular achievement under my Administration, thanks largely to Prime Minister Orbán. I look forward to continuing working closely with him so that both of our Countries can further advance this tremendous path to SUCCESS and cooperation.” Urging Hungarians to vote for Orbán, Trump continued: “He is a true friend, fighter, and WINNER, and has my Complete and Total Endorsement.… I AM WITH HIM ALL THE WAY!”

The framers of the Constitution tried to set up a system that would make it impossible for a president to go to war for private interests or the benefit of other countries, establishing that Congress alone can declare war. The framers wanted the American people to weigh in on whether they wanted to dedicate their lives and their fortunes to a war.

But Trump simply began the Iran war without consultation with Congress, and administration officials have refused to appear at hearings, instead briefing Congress behind closed doors. At an annual fundraising dinner for Republican members of Congress, Trump appeared to acknowledge he was violating the Constitution. He spoke of the “tremendous success” of what he called his “military operation” in Iran. He continued: “I won’t use the word war ’cause they say if you use the word war, that’s maybe not a good thing to do. They don’t like the word war because you are supposed to get approval. So I will use the word military operation.”

Now, as the war costs at least $1-2 billion a day and Trump’s declarations fluctuate wildly from saying the war is over to suggesting he is considering deploying ground troops to posting this morning that Iranian negotiators “better get serious soon, before it is too late, because once that happens, there is NO TURNING BACK, and it won’t be pretty!” even Republicans are starting to have misgivings. The war has pushed Trump’s approval rating down to just 36%, while a new Reuters poll shows that only 25% of Americans approve of how Trump is handling the cost of living. Today the stock market, which has generally trended downward since the invasion, dropped sharply as traders apparently recognized that the cost of oil is not coming down anytime soon.

Yesterday, after a classified briefing, House Armed Services Committee chair Mike Rogers (R-AL), who backed the Iran strikes, told reporters that Congress members “want to know more about what’s going on, what the options are, and why they’re being considered,” adding, “And we’re just not getting enough answers on those questions.” Chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee Roger Wicker (R-MS) commented: “I can see why he might have said that.”

 

Morelle noted that even if the White House or the Pentagon did start to provide specifics, “I’m not sure it would matter anyway because the president changes his mind so frequently. He might say something and literally without exaggeration, a half hour later say something completely different, or even sometimes within the same press conference, give two wildly different answers.”

Morelle told Walker and Kovensky: “They fight us on things that will help American families be able to pursue dreams, take care of the food, housing, and healthcare needs of millions of families that they can’t afford”—precisely the things that, as Minister Balakrishnan noted, the post–World War II international order enabled people around the world to attain. “But,” Morelle said, “they can go into an ill-conceived military action that has neither the support of Congress nor the support of American families, which has no clear objectives, shifting goals, and has alienated our allies and made us less safe.”


TACO Trump #234

Trump Backs Section 702 Reauthorization After Once Calling To ‘KILL FISA’

The president is much more concerned about the law’s potential now that he’s in charge of the government wielding it.

For the world there is no longer any such thing as American credibility

In the years after Barack Obama’s presidency, it became an article of faith that one of his central errors in foreign policy was the Syria “red line.” He had said he would attack Syria if it used chemical weapons — but when evidence emerged that it had used those weapons, he pushed the question of intervention to Congress, which declined to act.

“A disaster,” Donald Trump called it at the time. A cause of “generational and reputational damage,” said then-Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Florida). Part of “an incoherent maze” of foreign policy, Pete Hegseth argued a few years later. In ignoring a red line that he had drawn, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) explained, Obama had risked squandering American credibility around the world.

Obama’s red line flip flop looks like the model of careful policymaking compared to what we have witnessed since the Iran war began. Last week, President Trump posted on social media that “If Iran doesn’t FULLY OPEN, WITHOUT THREAT, the Strait of Hormuz, within 48 HOURS from this exact point in time, the United States of America will hit and obliterate their various POWER PLANTS, STARTING WITH THE BIGGEST ONE FIRST.”

The rest of the story is well known. Iran refused to be cowed by this threat and continued its attacks and its closure of the strait. Trump’s response? To quickly climb down and announce that he had postponed any action on energy infrastructure for five days, claiming that — suddenly, overnight — Iran and the U.S. had been engaged in “productive conversations” toward a “complete and total resolution of our hostilities in the Middle East.” The Iranians denied any such talks were taking place. Now Trump says he’s extending the pause by another week and a half.

It is by now clear that Trump is being graded on a curve. When he says he will raise tariffs to 130 percent or that he will blow up Iran’s biggest gas field or that “the war is very complete, pretty much” none of these statements mean much. They could be actual American policies or not, or they could stand as policy for a day or a week after which they will change. After saying that the war was pretty much complete, that same day Trump asserted that “we haven’t won enough” and that “we’ll not relent until the enemy is totally and decisively defeated.” He’s said that he agreed to negotiate with Iran’s leaders but then couldn’t because they keep getting killed — though it is of course his own military (and Israel’s) which is doing the killing. All clear?

Trump’s supporters claim this incoherence is strategic genius, that he is keeping people off guard. Except that policy seems to change for a variety of reasons: Maybe the stock market falls, or maybe the target country lavishes praise on Trump and gives him a gold bar. Trump’s superpower is that he is flexible enough to turn on a dime and has a base that will accept anything he proposes. Once unalterably opposed to Middle Eastern wars, many of his MAGA followers now believe in this Middle Eastern war with the zeal of converts. And while Trump has made clear that he would like to end the hostilities, the problem this time, unlike with tariffs, is that he cannot stop what he started. Iran gets a vote. And it is currently voting to keep fighting, calculating that though weakened, it has enough military power to do damage to the world economy, thereby inflicting pain on the U.S.
For the world there is no longer any such thing as American credibility, just a strange reality television show in which the main actor swerves, bobs and weaves his way through crises, hoping that what he says today will solve the crisis caused by what he said yesterday. The day before he threatened to obliterate Iran’s power plants, Trump had claimed that the US was considering “winding down” its military operations against Iran and implied that protecting the Strait of Hormuz was not his problem and could be dealt with by other nations whose imports passed through the strait. At another point, he said he didn’t need any other country’s help. Businessmen used to rail against previous administrations because of policy uncertainty. Now they line up to praise Trump as his carnival of chaos roils markets almost every week.

Trump has gotten used to playing with the U.S.’s massive power, punishing those who don’t bend the knee and rewarding those who do. In doing this, he is squandering credibility built up over decades to extract short-term goodies — sometimes to the benefit of his own family’s business interests. But in Iran he seems to have come up against an adversary that won’t play by his rules.


Trump loves to make up stuff (LIE)

At a Cabinet meeting on Thursday, President Donald Trump told a lengthy story about negotiating the creation of a personalized Sharpie pen. The only problem: the company that produces Sharpies denies it ever happened.

Theoretically, Trump’s tall tale was an attempt to prove his skill at saving money. It started with complaints about cost overruns tied to the renovation of the Federal Reserve building, but then the pen he was holding caught his attention, and it was tangent time.

“This pen is an interesting example,” before relating a presumably improvised story in which he called “the guy” and told him, “I’d like to use your pen, but I can’t have a great thing with a big S on it saying Sharpie as I’m signing a $1 trillion airplane contract to buy brand new fighter jets.”

“The guy,” said the President, offered to provide personalized black pens with “the White House” written in gold free of charge, until Trump insisted on paying $5 a pen.

Setting aside that this story does not, in fact, prove Trump’s thrift — were it authentic, he would have successfully negotiated the price up from free to $5 — it also turned out that it simply wasn’t true. According to a spokesperson from the manufacturer of Sharpie, “We don’t have any information about the conversation described.”

So with another Trump whopper in the news, here are five of his biggest and most baffling lies from the past several years.

1. “They’re eating the dogs.”

Who can forget when, at a presidential debate against Kamala <ahref=”https://www.rawstory.com/tag/white-house” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener”>Harris, Trump claimed that immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, were eating the city’s pets? Apparently voters forgot, and fast, because they elected him president shortly thereafter.

2. Wind energy is “driving whales crazy.”

Earlier this week, the Trump Administration agreed to pay nearly $1 billion to stop the construction of wind farms off the U.S. coast. He’s given all manner of justifications for his hatred of wind turbines over the years, but arguably the most nonsensical is his assertion about their effect on whales.

3. Impossible drug prices.

Over the past year, Trump has frequently claimed that his administration would cut drug prices by “900, 600, 500, 1,200” percent, and many other numbers. These numbers are, of course, impossible because math doesn’t work that way. If drug prices were reduced by 100%, they’d be free, and anything more than that, and they’d be paying you to take them.

4. His uncle knew the Unabomber.

Last year, Trump boasted that his Uncle John was a professor of Unabomber Ted Kaczynski at MIT, but it was quickly pointed out that that couldn’t be possible. First off, Kaczynski never went to MIT. Second, Uncle John died in 1985, and Kaczynski wasn’t revealed to be the Unabomber until 1996, so there was no way Unk could have spoken to Trump about the terrorist a decade before he was found to be one.

5. He warned us all about Osama bin Laden.

Just recently, Trump brought back a lie he’s told before: that the book he published in 2000 contained a warning that Osama bin Laden was going to commit a major attack. “I wrote it in a book. You can even check — about a year before the World Trade Center came down.” Indeed you can check, and people have, finding no such prediction.


Trump is TACO again, now 10 days!

A good start to my feelings:

Https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1AuJTeRjps/?mibextid=wwXIfr

Trump just threatened to commit a crime

Trump just threatened to commit a crime — and nobody stopped him

Kevin Lamarque
Sabrina Haake March 26, 2026 | 06:38AM ET

On March 21, at 7:44 pm, Trump threatened to “obliterate” Iran’s power plants if Iran didn’t reopen the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours. He posted his threat on social media (so transparent! so strong!), promising that if Iran didn’t open the Strait “within 48 HOURS from this exact point in time,” the U.S. “will hit and obliterate” their power plants. And, because the world is his subordinate, he thanked it for its attention to this matter.

Iran relies on 130 thermal plants across the country for more than 95% of its electricity. Targeting all those plants would be a war crime. Intentionally bombing any non-military infrastructure essential to the survival of civilians, like power plants, is a violation of international humanitarian law.

Why? Because when power plants collapse, water pumping and desalination stations stop functioning. With no water, civilians die from dehydration and organ failure, some within days, some within hours. Children and the elderly die first. When hospitals lose power, life-support machines shut down, and surgeries are cancelled. Food production and distribution also collapse without power. Amnesty International observed that, “By threatening such strikes, (Trump was) effectively indicating willingness to plunge an entire country into darkness, and to potentially deprive its people of their human rights to life, water, food, healthcare and adequate standard of living, and to subject them to severe pain and suffering.”


 IRAN JUST THREATENED UKRAINE 
Not the Middle East. Not a military base in Iraq. Not Israel.

UKRAINE.

A country already 3 years deep in a war with Russia — already bleeding, already broken — just became a “legitimate target” for IRAN.

Let that sink in.

 Iran says Ukraine helped Israel shoot down Iranian drones

 So a country fighting for its OWN survival helped an ally defend THEIR survival

 And Iran’s response? Declare every inch of Ukrainian territory fair game for strikes.

But here’s the part nobody is connecting:

 Iran and Russia have a military cooperation pact

 Iran has been supplying Russia with Shahed drones TO USE AGAINST Ukraine

 Now Iran is threatening to strike Ukraine DIRECTLY

 Russia is already bombing Ukraine from the north, east, and south

 Iran just offered to open a threat from the SOUTHEAST

They’re showing you Iran lashing out at everyone.

They’re NOT showing you that this isn’t random — it’s COORDINATED.

→ Russia wants Ukraine destroyed

→ Iran has been helping Russia destroy Ukraine for 3 years with drones

→ Now Iran has a “reason” to threaten Ukraine directly

→ Ukraine is forced to split its attention between TWO hostile nations

→ NATO is forced to split resources between TWO theaters of war

→ And that’s EXACTLY what both Russia and Iran want

One country fighting one war is survivable.

One country fighting two wars against two allies who WANT the same outcome?

That’s not a war. That’s an execution.

Prepare accordingly. 


Among the classified records taken to Mar-a-Lago by President Trump were documents so sensitive that one had been distributed to just six people, while another set was relevant to his business interests.

The disclosure, made to the House Judiciary Committee as part of its investigation into the probes into Trump, offers new details about the types of records the president took with him to Florida after losing the 2020 election.

The public is still barred from seeing former special counsel Jack Smith’s report surrounding the investigation that prompted him to bring Espionage Act charges against Trump after 300 documents with classified markings were discovered at his Florida estate.

The files shared with Congress include a January 2023 memo of work on Smith’s team. Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) also shared them on Tuesday.

In it, agents are seen discussing the need to secure permission to show the classified documents at trial, arguing that Trump’s business interest in the documents indicates his motive, while the closely held documents show the highly sensitive nature of the materials. The memo does not provide further specifics about the contents of the classified documents.

“Most damning is what these documents, cherry-picked by your own DOJ for disclosure, show about President Trump’s conduct,” Raskin wrote in a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, going to quote from the memo from Smith’s team.

The “FBI has also found that certain classified documents President Trump improperly retained ‘would be pertinent to certain business interests.’ DOJ prosecutors further assessed that these ‘classified documents pertinent to his business interests’ established ‘a motive for retaining them,” Raskin wrote.

“The memorandum further specifies that the disclosure of these documents represented ‘an aggravated potential harm to national security.’ The prosecutors also wrote that these were ‘highly sensitive documents—the type of documents that only presidents and officials with the most sensitive authority have.’ One ‘particularly sensitive document was accessible by only 6? people, including the president.’”

At another point in the memo, prosecutors discuss Trump showing a classified map to passengers traveling with him aboard a flight, including his now chief of staff Susie Wiles.

According to the panel’s Democrats, it’s possible the Justice Department disclosure may violate an order from U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon, who sided with Trump in barring the release of Smith’s report.

Cannon’s order barred Bondi from sharing the report or “any information or conclusions” from it.


Great, now we are going to have to breath SMOG

TRUMP is an idiot

US suspends anti-smog fuel rules in bid to ease pump prices


By Jarrett Renshaw
March 25, 2026
High gasoline prices at a Mobil station in West Hollywood
A gas pump is inserted inside an Audi vehicle at a Mobil gas station in Beverly Boulevard in West Hollywood, California, U.S., March 10, 2022. REUTERS/Bing Guan/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab
HOUSTON, March 25 (Reuters) – President Donald Trump’s administration announced on Wednesday it will temporarily suspend federal anti-smog ​regulations on seasonal gasoline blends to combat higher pump prices ‌since the start of the war on Iran.
The move by the Environmental Protection Agency will allow retailers to sell less expensive formulations of gasoline, including mixtures that include ​15% ethanol – known as E15 – that are typically not permitted during ​warmer months.


Iran dismisses US ceasefire proposal: State news agency
by Max Rego – 03/25/26 7:52 AM ET

Iran has dismissed an initial 15-point ceasefire proposal from the United States, according to the state-run Fars news agency.

“Iran does not accept a ceasefire,” an “informed person” told the outlet. “Basically, it is not logical to enter into such a process with those who violate the agreement.”

Pakistani officials confirmed Wednesday that the Islamic Republic had received the proposal, according to The Associated Press.

The Iranian military launched more strikes on Israel and the Persian Gulf region overnight, including an attack that sparked a massive fire at Kuwait International Airport.

Pakistani officials told the outlet that the peace plan centered on sanctions relief, civilian nuclear cooperation, missile limits, a rollback of Iran’s nuclear program and monitoring by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

It also includes opening up shipping access through the Strait of Hormuz. Since U.S.-Israeli strikes began on Feb. 28, Iran has significantly limited vessels traveling through the key passageway used to transport oil, resulting in an increase in global energy prices.

President Trump said Monday that previously threatened U.S. strikes on Iranian energy infrastructure would not occur for five days after “productive conversations” with Tehran. He also told reporters that same day that U.S. envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner spoke with their Iranian counterparts on Sunday.

On Tuesday, the president told reporters that he, Vice President Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, in addition to Witkoff and Kushner, are also involved in negotiations with Iran.

Even amid the alleged talks, the Pentagon is preparing to deploy roughly 2,000 soldiers from the U.S. Army’s 82nd Airborne Division to the Middle East, a source familiar with the matter told The Hill on Tuesday.

Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the speaker of the Iranian parliament, earlier this week denied that negotiations between Tehran and Washington were taking place.

“No negotiations have been held with the US, and [fake news] is used to manipulate the financial and oil markets and escape the quagmire in which the US and Israel are trapped,” he wrote on the social platform X.


Western powers were unable to secure shipping in the Red Sea. Hormuz will be harder


By Lisa Baertlein and Jonathan Saul
March 25

Summary
Red Sea efforts failed despite billions spent and military involvement

Iran’s military capabilities surpass those of the Houthis
High stakes for global oil supply and energy prices

 The Western allies trying to negotiate a way to protect the Strait of Hormuz for energy shipping face a stark reality: a similar effort in the Red Sea that started years earlier cost billions of dollars and ultimately failed against Yemen’s Houthis.

The costly Red ​Sea experience – four ships sunk, more than $1 billion in weapons expended, and a route that the shipping industry still largely avoids – looms over the more complex Strait of Hormuz, the shipping artery used by ‌roughly a fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas supply and now blocked by Iran, a more formidable adversary than the Houthis.

Iran’s threats to the strait and its attacks on energy infrastructure in nearby Gulf nations have sent oil prices soaring in the worst disruption to oil and gas supplies in history. Absent the strait’s reopening, shortages will become more acute, threatening higher costs for energy, food and numerous other products worldwide.


“There is no substitute for the Strait of Hormuz,” Kuwait Petroleum CEO Sheikh Nawaf Saud Al-Sabah said in a fiery video call streamed ​to the CERAWeek energy conference in Houston on Tuesday. “It is the world’s strait, under international law and practical reality.”


U.N. Security Council members on Tuesday were negotiating resolutions for protecting the strait, with some nations, such as ​Bahrain, taking a forceful stance that would authorize the use of “all necessary means” to protect the strait – which could mean the use of force.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Reuters interviewed 19 security and maritime ⁠experts who described the myriad challenges facing the U.S. and its allies in protecting the strait. Iran has far more advanced military forces than the Houthis, an arsenal of cheap drones, floating mines, and missiles, and easy access from its ​steep mountainous coast to the narrow waterway.

“Defending convoy operations in the Strait of Hormuz is significantly more challenging than in the Red Sea,” said retired Rear Admiral Mark Montgomery, who in 1988 was involved in U.S. tanker escorts through the ​Strait of Hormuz during the Iran-Iraq war.

That’s a big concern for U.S. President Donald Trump as he seeks to justify the Iran war ahead of the November midterm elections to inflation-weary American voters now facing gasoline at nearly $4 a gallon. The spike in energy prices is not expected to fully reverse until the waterway opens, analysts said.


Trump has been noncommittal about U.S. involvement, first saying the U.S. Navy will escort ships when needed, then more recently saying other nations should lead the effort. Iran has blocked most ships from the maritime chokepoint since ​joint U.S.-Israeli attacks on Iran began February 28.
Iran is considering a proposal to levy fees on vessels that want to use the strait, a Iranian lawmaker told state media last week.


THE HORMUZ QUAGMIRE
The U.S. mission to protect Red Sea shipping from the ​Houthis launched in December 2023, with European nations joining in with their own operation a few months later. The allies shot down hundreds of drones and missiles, but the Houthis still sank four ships between 2024 and 2025. Shippers now largely avoid the passageway, ‌once home to ⁠12% of world trade, opting for a much longer voyage around the Horn of Africa.


Global trade is in danger of losing steam

Global trade is in danger of losing steam due to the U.S. and Israeli war with Iran, the World Trade Organization warns.

Growth in world trade in goods will grow just 1.9% this ‌year, down from 4.6% growth in 2025 and could slow even more if the Middle East conflict keeps energy prices high and disrupts global transport, according to a WTO report.

If ⁠oil and liquefied natural gas prices remain high throughout 2026, growth of global trade in goods could drop to as little as 1.4%, while a prolonged blockade of the Strait of Hormuz by Iran, choking one-third of fertilizer urea imports, risks hitting major producers like India, Thailand, Brazil, fueling food security risks, the WTO says.

But even as the flow of Middle Eastern oil remains restricted, new trade lanes are opening. Australia and the European Union have finally inked a free trade deal after eight years of negotiations, removing tariffs on almost all goods and annoying both farmers on both sides. Here are the highlights of the deal.

The deal follows intensified talks amid sharply higher U.S. tariffs under the Trump administration and growing worries about China’s dominant position in rare earths and other critical minerals. The two sides also agreed to deepen security and defense cooperation.

 


ICE without masks at the Airport

Trump deployed ICE agents to major airports on March 23 amid mounting TSA callouts and travel delays. Their usual masked presence — often associated with aggressive sweeps of pedestrians in cities like Minneapolis — gave the public a rare, unfiltered look at the men and women actually behind the mask.