Deranged Trump

January 7, 2026

This morning, a federal agent from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) shot and killed 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good as she was driving away from ICE agents on a residential street in Minneapolis, Minnesota. According to Minneapolis leaders, Good was a legal observer: a volunteer trained to observe police conduct in case of future legal action.

Three videos taken at the scene show a maroon SUV perpendicular on a snowy street. A silver SUV driving up the street stops. Two officers wearing badges that say “police” and body armor get out of the vehicle and walk toward the maroon car.

One of them says, “Get out of the f*cking car,” and the other reaches through the open driver’s side window while trying to open the door. The driver backs up the vehicle, and straightens the wheel as if making a three-point turn. Then she starts slowly to accelerate along the street.

A third officer who has been standing on the side of the road pulls out a gun as the car is turning away. He shoots three times. The maroon car does not hit anyone as it rolls up the street, hitting another vehicle and then a utility pole. The shooter walks briskly away, apparently uninjured.

Seen in slow motion, a video shows the wheels of the maroon vehicle were fully turned away from the shooting officer, who made no effort to jump away, clearly suggesting he did not feel as if he were in danger. His first shot went through the windshield; the next two went through the driver’s side window as the car moved past him. An onlooker shouted “What the f*ck?!”

Video taken by another eyewitness shows ICE agents refusing to allow a self-identified physician to tend to the victim and telling him to back up. Although there is no one tending the clearly visible woman in the car, an agent says: “We have medics on scene. We have our own medics.” When another bystander screams: “Where are they? WHERE ARE THEY?!” an agent tells her, “Relax.” “How can I relax?” she shouts. “You just killed my f*cking neighbor.”

Yesterday the Trump administration deployed federal agents and officers to Minneapolis for what they called the largest federal immigration operation ever carried out, eventually planning to deploy 2,000 agents. The administration has been attacking Minnesota’s Somali community, and Homeland Security Kristi Noem was present at an ICE arrest yesterday, telling a man in handcuffs, who Homeland Security later said was from Ecuador, “You will be held accountable for your crimes.”

Rebecca Santana and Michael Balsamo of the Associated Press reported that Minnesota governor Tim Walz called the deployment “a war that’s being waged against Minnesota.” “You’re seeing that we have a ridiculous surge of apparently 2,000 people not coordinating with us, that are for a show of cameras,” he said.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) insists that its actions are protecting American citizens from “the worst of the worst” criminal immigrants, so the shooting of a young white woman, the mother of a young child, and how that would look, made it appear eager to smear Good.

It immediately put out a statement {that looked much like what it said after officers shot 30-year-old Chicago teaching assistant Marimar Martinez in October when it claimed she had “ambushed” agents, ramming their vehicle before an agent shot her five times. Footage showed that, in fact, the agents had rammed her car, and after the shooting one had sent a text message bragging: “I fired 5 rounds and she had 7 holes. Put that in your book boys.” }

The Department of Justice dropped the charges it had filed against her, asking a judge to “dismiss the indictment and exonerate” Martinez and her passenger.

Today, DHS posted on social media that “ICE officers in Minneapolis were conducting targeted operations when rioters began blocking ICE officers and one of these violent rioters weaponized her vehicle, attempting to run over our law enforcement officers in an attempt to kill them—an act of domestic terrorism. An ICE officer, fearing for his life, the lives of his fellow law enforcement and the safety of the public, fired defensive shots. He used his training and saved his own life and that of his fellow officers. The alleged perpetrator was hit and is deceased. The ICE officers who were hurt are expected to make full recoveries. This is the direct consequence of constant attacks and demonization of our officers by sanctuary politicians who fuel and encourage rampant assaults on our law enforcement who are facing 1,300% increase in assaults against them and an 8,000% increase in death threats.”

Trump jumped in with his own fact-free post lying that the shooter had been run over: “I have just viewed the clip of the event which took place in Minneapolis, Minnesota. It is a horrible thing to watch. The woman screaming was, obviously, a professional agitator, and the woman driving the car was very disorderly, obstructing and resisting, who then violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer, who seems to have shot at her in self defense. Based on the attached clip, it is hard to believe that he is alive, but is now recovering in the hospital. The situation is being studied, in its entirety, but the reason these incidents are happening is because the Radical Left is threatening, assaulting, and targeting our Law Enforcement Officers and ICE Agents on a daily basis. They are just trying to do the job of MAKING AMERICA SAFE. We need to stand by and protect our Law Enforcement Officers from this Radical Left Movement of Violence and Hate! PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP”

That both DHS and Trump posted false accounts of the shooting even as there are four videos circulating that reveal those accounts to be lies shows they no longer are making any attempt to justify their actions. Instead, they are demanding Americans abandon reality in favor of whatever the administration says. If this works, it would be a demonstration of totalitarian power, the ability to control how people think. Accepting that lie is a loyalty test.

But it is not working.

First of all, Sarah Jeong of The Verge noted that the reason there are so many videos is because “people cared enough to show up where ICE was and record them. It wasn’t just one or two legal observers, and when Good was shot, they didn’t abandon her.”

Second, elected Democrats are pushing back. “I’ve seen the video,” Governor Walz wrote. “Don’t believe this propaganda machine. The state will ensure there is a full, fair, and expeditious investigation to ensure accountability and justice.” To reporters, he said: “We’ve been warning for weeks that the Trump administration’s dangerous, sensationalized operations are a threat to our public safety, that someone was going to get hurt. Just yesterday I said exactly that. What we’re seeing is the consequences of governance designed to generate fear, headlines, and conflict. It’s governing by reality TV and today that recklessness cost someone their life. I’ve reached out to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem and I’m waiting to hear back.”

He told Minnesotans that, like them, he was angry, but “they want a show. We can’t give it to them. We cannot. If you protest and express your First Amendment rights, please do so peacefully as you always do. We can’t give them what they want…. To Americans, I ask you this. Please stand with Minneapolis.”

Walz prepared to call out the Minnesota National Guard if necessary, demonstrating that there would be no need for Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act and send in troops. He reminded Minnesotans that the Minnesota National Guard does not wear masks and that it is theirs, not Trump’s.

Minneapolis mayor Jacob Frey told reporters that the DHS statement was “bullsh*t. This was an agent recklessly using power that resulted in somebody dying, getting killed.” “To the family, I’m so deeply sorry,” Frey said. “There’s nothing that I can say right now that’s going to make you or your relatives, friends of the victim feel any better.” To ICE and other federal agents deployed in Minnesota, he added: “Get the f*ck out of Minneapolis. We do not want you here. Your stated reason for being in this city is to create some kind of safety, and you are doing exactly the opposite. People are being hurt. Families are being ripped apart…and now somebody is dead.”

But something else was also going on today. At the same time the administration was pouring gasoline on the domestic fire ICE had sparked and the international fire it had set with its attacks on Venezuela and threats against Greenland, it was quietly making a number of major financial moves.

The smallest of those moves was that today Trump asked Fulton County, Georgia, for a $6.2 million payout in attorneys’ fees and costs after the criminal charges against him in Georgia were dismissed. Trump had been indicted for trying to overturn the 2020 presidential election in Georgia by pressuring Georgia secretary of state Brad Raffensberger to “find” 11,780 votes to give him a victory in the state of Georgia. In November 2025 a new special prosecutor dropped the charges, citing the difficulty of prosecuting a case against a sitting president. Trump boasted on social media of his victory over an “illegal, unconstitutional, and unAmerican hoax,” and continued to push the lie that Democrats stole the election.

Vicky Ge Huang of the Wall Street Journal reported that the Trump family’s cryptocurrency venture World Liberty Financial today applied for a national banking license from the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, part of the Treasury Department. A banking license would integrate the Trump family’s cryptocurrency more fully into mainstream finance.

If the Treasury Department issues the license—a potential outcome that critics say reveals a major conflict of interest for the president—the president and chair of the new company would be Zach Witkoff, whose father is the son of Trump’s envoy to Russia Steve Witkoff, who the Wall Street Journal recently reported had been handpicked for his role by Russian president Vladimir Putin. The younger Witkoff started World Liberty Financial in 2024 with Trump’s sons Don Jr., Eric, and Barron.

Today, Energy Secretary Chris Wright told an audience at a Goldman Sachs energy industry event in Miami, Florida, that the United States will take control of all oil from Venezuela for the foreseeable future. Lisa Desjardins and Nick Schifrin of PBS NewsHour reported this afternoon that Trump administration officials have told lawmakers that they plan to put the money raised from their seizure of Venezuelan oil into bank accounts outside the U.S. Treasury. Desjardins clarified that “[s]ources said they understood these as similar [to] or decidedly ‘off-shore’ accounts.”

Yesterday, Trump announced that, as president of the United States, he would control the money from the sale of Venezuelan oil.

And then, this afternoon, Trump’s social media account first threatened the defense contractor Raytheon, saying that “[e]ither Raytheon steps up, and starts investing in more upfront Investment like Plants and Equipment, or they will no longer be doing business with Department of War.”

Then, the same account posted: “After long and difficult negotiations with Senators, Congressmen, Secretaries, and other Political Representatives, I have determined that, for the Good of our Country, especially in these very troubled and dangerous times, our Military Budget for the year 2027 should not be $1 Trillion Dollars, but rather $1.5 Trillion Dollars. This will allow us to build the ‘Dream Military’ that we have long been entitled to and, more importantly, that will keep us SAFE and SECURE, regardless of foe. If it weren’t for the tremendous numbers being produced by Tariffs from other Countries, many of which, in the past, have ‘ripped off’ the United States at levels never seen before, I would stay at the $1 Trillion Dollar number but, because of Tariffs, and the tremendous income they bring, amounts being generated, that would have been unthinkable in the past (especially just one year ago during the Sleepy Joe Biden Administration, the Worst President in the History of our Country!), we are able to easily hit the $1.5 Trillion Dollar number while, at the same time, producing an unparalleled Military Force, and having the ability to, at the same time, pay down Debt, and likewise, pay a substantial Dividend to moderate income Patriots within our Country!”

Simon Rosenberg of The Hopium Chronicles wrote: “Trump has gone completely mad.”


Trump put up a fake website vidicating himself for Jan 6, lying all the way,

NPR put up this:
https://apps.npr.org/jan-6-archive/

I am sorry; I really am. You have children and a family- you have a mortgage or rent, hobbies, friends, and a life. You won’t like this- it will be controversial. However, I think it is something we all need to hear.

First, let me start with a story


On September 11th, 2001, it was a normal Tuesday like any other, a slow Tuesday even. Then, as the morning went on, planes started changing course and shutting off their transponders. The Hijackers, trying to make announcements to the passengers, accidentally sent out messages to everyone on the frequency, including air traffic control.

Hijackers had overtaken the cockpits of 4 planes using bombs (likely fake) and knives. Their intent was to use them as missiles. At 8:46, the North Tower of the WTC was hit, followed by the South Tower at 9:03.

On United Airlines Flight 93, a similar story played out. However, a delay on the ground and the delay in the actual hijacking led to the cockpit being controlled at 9:28- 30 minutes after the WTC towers had been struck and mere minutes from the attack on the Pentagon.

The 33 passengers were coraled to the back of the plane under the watch of a hijacker, where they began to use the in-flight phones to call their loved ones starting at 9:30. The passengers had been told that they were hotages but they learned quickly from their families over the phone that the hijackers had other plans.

After uncovering the details, the passengers made an incredibly brave decision: they would retake the plane. They waited until the plane was over rural countryside, knowing that they were likely to crash, and began their revolt at 9:57. By 9:59, they had subdued the hijackers and began to try to breach the cockpit.

The hijackers piloting the plane began to make drastic maneuvers to prevent the breach, but it only delayed it. It was clear by 10:01 that they would breach in seconds. The hijackers thus pointed the plane’s nose down to crash. At 10:03, the plane crashed with no survivors, but by taking these heroic actions, hundreds or thousands of lives were saved.

I tell you now, friends, that we are on our own Flight 93. Our nation has been hijacked, and while we may be corralled in the back, we have the real power.


The parable of the “plane” is often used in politics, even by me. We are all on this “plane” together, and wanting the plane to crash because you hate the pilot is illogical. I am not saying that the Trump regime is the same as 9/11 terrorists, nor am I saying that we are facing the same horror that those brave passengers faced. I bring up Flight 93 first to pay homage to some great American heroes and second to expand upon this common parable.

If we are all on this plane together, then make no mistake- it has been hijacked. An unelected South African Billionaire has been given the keys to the castle. Think of how corrupt this is. A US President (and felon) has given an unelected rich donor the right to fire and reform the entire administrative wing of the US Government. Veterans will suffer, the elderly will suffer, and YOU will suffer, thanks to Trump and Musk.

More than that, Musk is using this moment to enrich himself and protect his empire at our expense. As I write this, Musk is attacking (or “downsizing”)…

  • The United States Department of Agriculture: Currently investigating Musk’s Neuralink for animal abuse and experimentation
  • The Department of Labor: Currenly investigating Musk’s companies for retaliation firing, harassment (the worst kind), and safety violations
  • The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: Currently trying to regulate Musk’s payment system at X
  • The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): A primary competitor of SpaceX

This is by no means a complete list. This is not even the worst part about the Trump Presidency. In a follow-up post, I will dive into that in more detail. It is horrifying and hilarious.

The heroic passengers of Flight 93 had no help, and neither do we. People are exhausted, and resistance to Trump has been minimal. All that anti-Trump 2016 energy is gone. Democrats have stated they have “no leverage” and are just making podcasts. The courts are terrified that Trump will ignore or defy their decisions.

We have to take the plane back and land it ourselves.


Let’s be honest about something else- the founding fathers did not “found” America by asking. Sometimes peace works, and sometimes it does not. Let’s be adults and realize that force is required to enact change. Not violence, mind you, force. Maybe political force, maybe economic force, but force nonetheless.

  • I want to press this again. LEGAL and NONVIOLENT action is needed. Violence allows Trump to play the victim, crack down on civil liberties, and portray the opposition as criminal. More importantly, it leads to actual harm.

Trump is bad, but he is a symptom more than a problem. In the US (and Europe), we are facing growing wealth inequality, an unstable economy, international conflicts, and a rapidly changing society. This leads to fear, and Populism thrives on fear. Over 2,000 years ago, the same set of factors led to Populism as it did 92 years ago in Weimar Germany.

We need radical reform. In my plane metaphor, the hijackers have overtaken a malfunctioning plane. First, we must regain control of the plane and arrest its descent into the ground. Then, we can worry about fixing the malfunction.

So what can you do?


Step 1: Be the best you

Cheesy right? The reality is this- you cannot change the world alone; none of us can. It was not 1 person who regained control of Flight 93, it was everyone. This isn’t a money thing; it’s a community thing. Be that trusted person in your community (whatever it is). When your coworker Tom wants to start a Union, he knows you can be trusted and will help. When your neighbor Trisha, a legal migrant, fears her 5-year-old son will be deported, she knows you will help her. To be this person, you must be honest, stable, and the “best” you that you can be. So take care of yourself.

During the Holodomor (a famine/genocide of Ukrainians by Russia), a woman named Kyivan Lidia Balitska found that her neighbors had bloated from starvation. She began to find and smuggle them food at great risk to herself. Of the 9 members of the family, 7 survived thanks to her. This is what being a reliable, brave member of your community looks like.

Step 2: Join something

Go out and join a group. It could be a TV Show fan club that talks politics or a book club. Engage with the community and organize. Find like-minded individuals, people with similar goals and desires.

In a war, the biggest step is mobilization. You have to get the troops into their positions, establish communications, define goals, scout the enemy, make plans, and prepare necessary resources. A good way to lose wars is to be the last to mobilize or to mobilize too late. Famously, the Prussians dominated the French in the Franco-Prussian War despite having fewer men, in part due to mobilization efforts.

The time to mobilize is not after the war has started but before. So, begin this process now. Organize, prepare, and be ready- not for war but for resistance and whatever form that needs to take.

Step 3: Be brave

Be who you are. Tell your friends, tell your family (if wise). Recruit and spread the message. We need allies in every industry, from gas stations to banks. We need unity- we need numbers. This may mean some awkward conversations with friends or coworkers when appropriate. Be who you are.

The more allies we have, the more strength we have. It gives us reach, resources, and power. Spread the message that resistance is alive and well- that we have not surrendered to Trump- and that the fight continues.

Step 4: Ride the tiger

You’re a reliable member of your community, you are a member of a group of like-minded folks, and this group has grown. Now take action- ride the tiger.

So what did you mobilize for? Well, it could be a lot depending on what is to come. Boycotts, protests, attending town halls, writing to politicians demanding they fight, preparing for local and national elections- a whole lot of things.

  • I have it on good authority that real letters actually written with intent have far more meaning than basic boilerplate “do X” letters/emails. I know a person who was on the receiving end, and they confirmed that despite getting hundreds or thousands of emails, 3 that were actually written with passion stood out and made an impression.

Kansas Senator Roger Marshall held a Town Hall Saturday where he was shouted down by his own voters, livid over Trump’s actions. This has been happening a lot, and you better believe this forces people into action. Get loud and be honest.

MAGA wants to dominate school boards and local offices- that is a fight we can begin right now. It just takes effort and courage, and we can begin to take back control of our nation.


During WW2, Abdol Hossein Sardari was an Iranian Muslim Diplomat in Paris. When the Germans invaded, he was ordered to return to Tehran. Instead, he spent the war forging passports for Iranian and non-Iranian Jews and even hiding their valuables. It is estimated he saved 3,000 lives.

Ans van Dijk was a Dutch woman (and a Jewish person) who was arrested by the SS in 1943. She agreed to work for the SS in exchange for her release. She proceeded to join the resistance, where she would offer vulnerable Jewish people a hiding place and instead lead them into a trap. She was paid per Jew, and while the circumstances of her life were extraordinary, in total, some 700 Jews died because of her.

Are we Abdol, or are we Ans? Of course, we think we are Abdol but, are we really? Would you risk your life for others? Will you have the bravery to put everything on the line to do what is right or comply and remain safe? Wrestle with this question now.

This is not a partisan issue- this is us, the PEOPLE, retaking control from the oligarchs. It’s not left vs right; it’s right vs wrong. It does not matter how you voted- it matters what you do.

BREAKING: Ex-NATO General stuns MAGA world by calling on Europe to wage war against the United States if Trump seizes Greenland.

The formerly unthinkable is now being said out loud by European allies in reaction to Donald Trump’s illegal kidnapping of a sovereign nation’s president and his obvious designs on taking Greenland from Denmark.

A former top NATO commander, Lt. Gen. Michel Yakovleff of France, has delivered a stunning warning to the world: If Donald Trump moves to seize Greenland, Europe must be ready to fight back—even against the United States.

Yakovleff, who spent decades at NATO’s highest military levels, didn’t mince words. If Trump threatens European sovereignty, he says, Europe must be prepared to defend itself—even if that means a historic rupture with Washington. “If Trump moves on Greenland, Europeans must be ready to fight the U.S.,” he said flatly. This isn’t posture nor bluster. Those are fighting words.

This is what Trump’s America has become: so reckless, so imperial, so hostile to allies that a retired NATO general is openly discussing a “divorce” from the United States and the end of NATO itself.

Yakovleff warned that Trump’s bullying rhetoric and open threats against Greenland— a territory that’s part of Denmark, a NATO ally — are incompatible with any alliance based on mutual defense and respect. If Trump treats allies like conquered territory, Yakovleff argues, Europe must respond by protecting its own sovereignty, even if it means expelling U.S. forces from key bases like Ramstein and Naples.

Let’s examine what this really means: Trump’s behavior is now so destabilizing that serious European leaders are contemplating kicking the U.S. military out of Europe.

This isn’t happening in a vacuum. Yakovleff previously went viral for saying what many world leaders quietly believe: that Trump “works for Putin,” or at minimum advances Vladimir Putin’s interests by undermining NATO, weakening Ukraine, and sowing chaos among democratic allies. Whether through incompetence, ego, or something darker, Trump is doing exactly what the Kremlin wants: breaking the Western alliance from the inside. And now, the consequences are coming into focus.

Yakovleff is clear-eyed about the imbalance of power — Europe doesn’t want war with the U.S. But he’s even clearer about the stakes. If America abandons the rules-based order and starts threatening allies with military force, then NATO, by definition, is already dead.

This is the cost of Trump’s authoritarian fantasy politics: allies preparing for confrontation, alliances collapsing, and America transformed from the leader of the free world into a global threat that even its closest partners must plan to resist.

Trump promised “America First.” What he’s delivering is America Alone—and feared.


Trump Wants To Seize Greenland Because He Doesn’t Understand Trade

Presidents should try to nudge the world toward more trade and less war whenever possible. Trump is doing the opposite.

Imagine for a moment that you have the misfortune to be elected president of some nation. A neighboring nation possesses valuable natural resources that you’d like to have. How to proceed?

You could seize those resources by force. Certainly that’s been a common method across much of human history. Hire some thugs to take what you want. Have them beat up the other guy if he gets in the way. Give your thugs uniforms and an internal hierarchy, and you might fool some people into believing the whole thing is more legitimate. Alternatively, you could offer the other nation some of your own resources in exchange for the ones you want. Things go even more smoothly if you let the people in your country offer their resources in exchange for the stuff in the other country that they want. If you happen to be president of a country with the world’s reserve currency, this deal gets better yet: Instead of offering your own resources, your people can probably just trade money for the things they want, and the other country will be happy to accept. Everyone gets what they want and no one has to fight over it. Unfortunately, President Donald Trump does not seem to understand this on a fundamental level. Again and again, Trump has shown that he views free trade as a suckers game. Why should everyone end up better off when he could win while others lose? The Trump administration’s renewed impulse to seize Greenland—on the heels of a military attack aimed at seizing Venezuelan oil production—is the latest example of this. It’s also perhaps the riskiest, given that Greenland is a part of Denmark (even though it has been semiautonomous since 1979) and Denmark is a member of NATO. In an interview on Monday, Trump adviser Stephen Miller refused to rule out the use of military force to seize the island. “Nobody’s going to fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland,” Miller said. “We live in a world…that is governed by strength, that is governed by force, that is governed by power.”

This may be a bluff, but we should be clear-eyed about the threat. Miller is talking about a military attack by the United States against Denmark, a longtime ally and fellow member of NATO. Per NATO’s rules, an attack against one member is treated as an attack against all, and as such, all NATO members would be required to respond. That’s unlikely to happen, so the effective result would be the “collapse” of NATO, as Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen put it this week.

Should NATO have been restructured or abolished long ago, once the Soviet Union and its Warsaw Pact were no longer aroundAbsolutely. Is an attack by one NATO country against another the proper way to go about restructuring the alliance? Good gravy, no. So why is the Trump administration threatening such an insane thing? One possible answer is that Greenland has resources America needs. And, indeed, Greenland does have valuable mineral deposits and might be sitting atop a reserve of natural gas and oil. Gee, if only there were some way to get at them without having to resort to force!

But the most valuable resource Greenland possesses is likely its spot on the map. When the Trump administration talks about Greenland as being vital for national security purposes, that’s because it is adjacent to Russia—use a less traditional map to understand how—and crucial to controlling airspace around the Arctic. (Trump and his allies are also recently spouting off some manifest destiny–esque nonsense about controlling “our” hemisphere, but that’s a less practical consideration.)

Admittedly, land is harder to trade than many other resources. Still, the principle is the same: You can take land by force, or you can offer something you have for something you want. America has spent the past century creating global institutions—like NATO—to discourage the former and encourage the latter, and that’s worked out quite well. It is that cooperative approach that explains why the U.S. has stationed troops and built airbases in Greenland since striking a deal with Denmark in 1951. Everyone wins: America gets a stronger foothold in the Arctic and first alert defense against Russian nukes, and Denmark (a tiny country that’s not a national security threat to anyone) gets protection by being a part of NATO and allies with the United States. There is no good reason—absolutely none—for Trump to blow up that arrangement and seize Greenland by force.

Finally, here’s the most important thing about free trade that Trump fails to grasp: It is voluntary and consensual.

Rolling into Greenland with guns blazing—or making enough threats that Denmark eventually hands the island over to avoid that possibility—is the exact opposite of that. Trump’s centralized, nationalistic view of the world has no room for individuals or their consent. What do the people of Greenland want? What do the people of Denmark want? Heck, most Americans are not very keen on the idea of their government seizing Greenland. It’s not quite accurate to say that no one wants this—some very powerful people unfortunately do—but this would be something that the U.S. government would be doing against the will of most of the individuals involved in the transaction. That should matter—a lot. In fairness, it is encouraging to see that the Trump administration is putting together an offer that will reportedly be presented directly to the semiautonomous government of Greenland. The Economist reports that the deal includes giving Greenland the same status as the Marshall Islands and some other small Pacific islands. The people of Greenland have the right to vote on their own future. If Trump’s deal is accepted, then Denmark (and others) should stand aside. But it certainly seems like that deal would have had a better chance of being accepted without all the bellicosity that has gone along with it. Again, one of the glorious things about free trade is that no one points a gun (or the whole U.S. military’s terrifying arsenal) at you to make a deal happen. Individuals buy and sell things when and how it makes sense for them to do it. Yes, it is impossible to apply that logic to every aspect of international geopolitics, but presidents ought to nudge the world toward more trade and less war whenever possible. Trump is doing the opposite. That is happening, at least in part, because Trump doesn’t understand the value of free trade. Everything happening with Greenland is downstream of that grievous problem.

Trump’s War Is Dumb, Brazen—and Of Course, All About Oil

We are getting a little more brazen the more such wars we conduct. Trump’s assertion that Maduro’s drug trafficking was responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans was laughable. Indeed, there really is no Cartel del los Soles. It is a term of art (like Antifa) that doesn’t describe a real organization but rather a set of loosely associated activities and actors. What is more, Trump did not and does not seek the approval of Congress or the support of allies for his actions. Further, of course, neither Congress nor any coalition of allies would have the power to authorize the U.S. to seize the national assets of a sovereign nation, even if they wanted to.

The last time Trump wanted to seize oil to pay for a war—in that case actions against ISIS—his team blocked it because such actions would be illegal. But this time, his team of kowtowing sycophants are going along with what could easily become one of the largest acts of theft in modern history.

Just like in the case of the second Iraq War, Team Trump clearly has no idea what to do next. The plan, per Trump’s truly weird, meandering press conference (during which he often slurred his words and seemed to have trouble staying awake), seems to be that we’ll figure things out as we go.

Who is in charge of Venezuela now? Trump and his national security team? For how long? Until there’s a transition to a stable future (read: agreed to U.S. control of oil assets). Will the war spread to places like Colombia, Cuba or Mexico? Trump and his team issued threats to all three. (Prior targets Greenland and Panama went unmentioned… for now.) Trump even cringe-flexed that his desire to “dominate” the Western Hemisphere was now being called the “Donroe Doctrine.”

In other words, as bad as America’s past crimes on behalf of the oil lords have been and as badly as they have turned out, we’re at it again.


 

Axios is reporting that during the course of the day Trump raised the possibility of future interventions in Colombia, Cuba, and Mexico.

 Trump The Terrible told us he was now in charge of Venezuela. His words and meaning were very clear:

 

This afternoon the Venezuelan government, still very much in charge of the country, disputed Trump’s claim. 

President Trump said Delcy Rodríguez was sworn in as Venezuela’s interim president and would act as a partner in letting the United States run the country.

“She’s essentially willing to do what we think is necessary to make Venezuela great again,” he said.

Less than two hours later, Ms. Rodríguez — who was Nicolás Maduro’s vice president — delivered a televised address to Venezuela that made clear she viewed the United States as an illegal invader that must be rejected.

“We are determined to be free,” she said. “What is being done to Venezuela is a barbarity.”

Her swift defiance of Mr. Trump made clear that his plans to swoop into the South American nation and run it as his own faced many more hurdles than he suggested in his Saturday news conference declaring victory in Venezuela.

“We had already warned that an aggression was underway under false excuses and false pretenses, and that the masks had fallen off, revealing only one objective: regime change in Venezuela,” she said. “This regime change would also allow for the seizure of our energy, mineral and natural resources. This is the true objective, and the world and the international community must know it.”

Significantly, Ms. Rodríguez delivered her address alongside what she called Venezuela’s National Defense Council, which included the nation’s defense minister, attorney general and the heads of the country’s legislature and judiciary. That unified front directly contradicted Mr. Trump’s claim that the United States would run Venezuela, especially given that White House and Pentagon officials had said that U.S. aircraft and extraction forces had returned to the U.S.S. Iwo Jima.

Venezuela’s defense minister and attorney general also both publicly criticized Mr. Trump and the U.S. military action on Saturday.

In his news conference, Mr. Trump said that Venezuelan leaders must comply with the United States or else. “All political and military figures must realize that what happened to Maduro can happen to them,” he said.

Ms. Rodríguez’s speech also made clear that Mr. Maduro’s supporters — including her — still see him as the nation’s legitimate leader.

She repeatedly said that Mr. Maduro was Venezuela’s “only president” and even the text on Venezuelan state television labeled her as vice president. When she ended, the state broadcaster said that Ms. Rodríguez was the vice president who had just stated that Mr. Maduro was Venezuela’s president.

Did Trump, in another one of his delusions and confabulations, just imagine himself as the new ruler of Venezuela this morning? How does someone get something like this so wrong? And if Trump did invent something of this import, how can he be allowed to keep running the country?

We can’t fight another expensive, endless war. Demand Congress take action. Together, we say NO U.S. occupation of Venezuela!

Trump keeps telling us that he’s going to stop endless wars and lower costs. Yet today he’s spending millions of taxpayer dollars to invade Venezuela, capture its President, Nicolás Maduro, and declare that the US will now run Venezuela. What?!

Many of you who are reading this marched and protested against the Iraq war. We saw through George Bush’s lies and knew that war would only make everyone less safe. We were right.

This moment is a test. Trump and his advisors will be looking to see Americans’ reactions to this horror. Any silence will be seen as acceptance. If we don’t loudly push back against more endless war, then the administration will escalate this violence, not just in Venezuela, but across the globe. Panama, Greenland and Canada are on tRump’s wish list.

Maduro is a dictator who oppressed his own people. Yet this operation has nothing to do with the Venezuelan people or Venezuelan freedom. Instead, as Trump himself said, this is an attempt to build power and profit for the Trump administration and the president’s oil industry cronies.

 

Trump needs to focus on the problems we have here at home—like making sure people can afford groceries or keep their healthcare—instead he’s spending millions pursuing violence overseas.

I know we may feel powerless when it comes to war overseas, but that’s not true. The Iraq war protests fundamentally changed the politics of this country because of the mass outpouring of rage from people like us.

Over the coming days and weeks, many will tell us that this is too complicated and only experts should weigh in. They are wrong. They believe people like us should get shut out while oil executives and war manufacturers prioritize profit over people. Venezuelans should run Venezuela, not Trump.


Trump says Maduro captured, flown out as US military conducts ‘large scale’ strike

by Filip Timotija – 01/03/26 5:21 AM ET

Trump said that United States personnel captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife and were flown out of the country as the U.S. military carried out “large scale” strike inside the nation in the early morning hours on Saturday, an operation that came after a monthslong standoff between the two leaders.

“This operation was done in conjunction with U.S. Law Enforcement,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social, adding that more details will be announced at a press conference at 11 a.m.
Explosions were heard in the early hours in Caracas, the nation’s capital, and some parts of the city reported being without electricity.

The Venezuelan government accused the U.S. military of targeting military and civilian locations in Caracas, along with strikes in the states of Aragua, La Guaira and Miranda.

Maduro, who has been in power since 2013, signed a state of emergency, the country’s communications ministry said in a statement, adding that it urged “all social and political forces” in the country to “activate mobilization plans and repudiate” the attack from the U.S.

The capture of Maduro came just days after the Venezuelan strongman said he was open to conducting negotiations with the U.S. regarding drug trafficking and oil. Maduro and Trump spoke over the phone in November.

Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodríguez said that the whereabouts of Maduro and his wife are unknown and demanded proof of life from the Trump administration.

Both the Pentagon and the U.S. Southern Command referred The Hill to the White House when reached for comment. The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) said he spoke with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who told him that Maduro was arrested to “stand trial on criminal charges” in the U.S. and that the U.S. strikes in Venezuela were deployed to “protect and defend those executing the arrest warrant.”

“This action likely falls within the president’s inherent authority under Article II of the Constitution to protect U.S. personnel from an actual or imminent attack,” Lee said Saturday morning on social platform X.

Maduro was indicted in March 2020 by the Justice Department on terrorism and drug trafficking charges.

The U.S. attack came after months of tensions, jabs and threats from Trump and U.S. officials toward Maduro, who the U.S. government has accused of being  head of a drug cartel and was deemed an “illegitimate leader.”

Since August, the U.S. military has been establishing a massive military presence in the Southcom area, sending warships, at least one submarine, F-35 fighter jets, MQ-9 Reaper drones and spy planes in what the administration argued was a buildup to curb the flow of illicit drugs in the region and protect the U.S.

There are about 15,000 U.S. service members stationed in the Southcom area, a U.S. defense official recently told The Hill.

Trump has repeatedly mused about authorizing land strikes inside Venezuela and told reporters in late December that it would be “smart” for Maduro to leave, but that it is “up to him what he wants to do.”

Since early September, the U.S. has been carrying out lethal strikes against alleged drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific. The U.S. forces have conducted a minimum of 35 strikes and killed at least 115 “narco-terrorists.”

The CIA conducted a drone strike against a Venezuelan port facility recently, where U.S. officials believe the transnational gang Tren de Aragua stores drugs that are sent elsewhere.


A letter from Jeffrey Epstein to Larry Nassar was just released as part of the latest batch of Epstein files released. Written in 2019, it is one of the last letters sent by Epstein before his death. In fact, he appears to be alluding to his own impending demise in the letter.

 

The text is pretty clear-cut. It is in the handwriting of Jeffrey Epstein. And already in 2023, references to the letter were made. It just wasn’t revealed until now. It reads, in full:

Dear L. N.

As you know by now, I have taken the ‘short route’ home. Good luck! We shared one thing . . . our love & caring for young ladies at the hope they’d reach their full potential.

Our president shares our love of young, nubile girls. When a young beauty walked by he loved to ‘grab snatch,’ whereas we ended up snatching grub in the mess halls of the system.

Life is unfair.

Yours,

J. Epstein

 

The “short route home”, is this a reference to Epstein’s impending end? I wonder. He does make it very clear that “our president” (this letter was written in 2019, during Trump’s first term) shares their love for “young, nubile girls”.

So yes, he’s implicated. Google Larry Nassar, if by any chance you do not know who Larry Nassar is and what type of “nubile girls” he targetted, for which he has been sentenced for over 300 years in jail. This isn’t subtle anymore.


Trump gives away the game on his motivations for the first vetoes of his second term

The president has threatened to impose “harsh measures” on Colorado unless the state frees a felon he likes. We now know what that means in practice.

 

 

 

In a rare moment of courage, Indiana Republican state senator Greg Walker publicly humiliated Donald Trump after being invited to a White House meeting. Unlike many in his party who blindly bow to Trump, Walker reminded the former president of a simple truth: he works for the American people, not the other way around.

In November, Trump’s White House sent a text through Director of Intergovernmental Affairs Alex Meyer: “The President wants to know if you could come to the White House to meet with him on Wednesday afternoon. I left you a voicemail. Can we discuss by phone?” The invitation aimed to secure Walker’s support for MAGA’s controversial gerrymandering plans in Indiana.

Walker refused to play along. His reply was sharp, firm, and unforgettable: “Mr. President is on my payroll but I know he is not requesting a work review; I decline the offer.”

Unlike most GOP lawmakers who fall over themselves to praise Trump, Walker’s response reminded him that he is not a king. He works for taxpayers, and Walker would not bend to political coercion.

Walker also flagged a potential violation of the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal employees from engaging in certain political activities while on the job. He told The Republic: “The underling who reached out to me is trying to influence the election on my dime. He works for me. He works for you. He’s on my payroll, and he’s campaigning on company time. That’s a violation of the Hatch Act.” He added, however, that reporting it seemed pointless in today’s political environment.

He also criticized Trump’s interference in Indiana’s affairs: “How can he have the time and interest to bother with a nobody like me when there’s so many things on his plate that are so much more important for our country? We’ve already done our job. The whole idea came out of Washington to begin with.”

Walker’s principled stance paid off. The Trump administration’s push to manipulate Indiana’s redistricting ultimately failed, proving that when Trump loses, democracy wins.

This incident is a rare but powerful reminder that public officials exist to serve the people, not to act as sycophants for a president’s political agenda.

Rob Dannenberg, former chiefs of operations for the CIA

“Putin looks at Trump and sees a weak guy, vain, with huge ego…. He’s being manipulated in the way that a good case officer like Putin would manipulate this guy. He’s not monogamous, he’s greedy, he’s fascinated by gold — all these are things that, if I were a case officer, I would be leveraging to get this guy to do whatever I want him to do. When that happens to align with Trump’s ambition to get a Nobel Peace Prize, so much the easier, right? You’re pushing on an open door.”


Tilting at windmills: Trump laments death of bald eagle in the US … which was really a falcon in Israel

A pity that Trump, or one of the 18 intelligence agencies reporting to him, did not trace the image back to its source.

Even while on holiday at his Florida resort, Donald Trump has refused to take a break from his unrelenting war on wind energy.

Late Tuesday, the US president posted an image of a dead bird beneath a turbine on social media, accompanied by the lament: “Windmills are killing all of our beautiful Bald Eagles!”

The post was immediately amplified by an official White House account on X with more than a million followers.

Unfortunately for Trump’s effort to sow outrage among American patriots at what he proclaimed to be an image of the national bird laid low, closer inspection reveals the photograph does not show a bald eagle and was not taken in the United States. The image actually shows a falcon that was at a wind farm in Israel eight years ago.

In his rush to post the image on his social media platform, Trump overlooked a pair of visual clues that might have given him pause. The first is that the bird is missing the distinctive markings of a bald eagle. The second is that the turbine blamed for its death appears to have Hebrew writing on it.

A quick survey of Israeli wind farms blamed for bird deaths reveals that the image in question was indeed taken by Hedy Ben Eliahou, an employee of Israel’s Nature and Parks Authority, and was featured in a 2017 report in Haaretz, the Tel Aviv news outlet., and it may not have been the turbine that caused its death,


Jack Smith deposition reveals plans for trial, possible charges against co-conspirators

 

Former special counsel Jack Smith was still contemplating whether to charge President Trump’s co-conspirators in the Jan. 6, 2021, case when the president won the election, he revealed to the House in a closed-door deposition released Wednesday.

Smith also told investigators he was preparing to rely on a number of Trump allies who agreed to testify against the president that “what they were trying to do was an attempt to overthrow the government and illegal.” He also said the violence of Jan. 6 was “foreseeable” to Trump.

“Our case was built on, frankly, Republicans who put their allegiance to the country before the party,” Smith told the panel’s team over the course of a more than seven-hour interview on Dec. 17.

The Justice Department prohibited Smith from talking about not-yet-public information related to his investigation into Trump’s retention of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. He was also more broadly prohibited from speaking about aspects of either case against Trump still covered by grand jury secrecy rules.

But the 255-page transcript offers new insights into Smith’s approach to the case, a rare window into the mind of a prosecutor prohibited from making bombshell statements about the case and who has been little heard from since a brief press conference in 2022 announcing he would oversee the investigations.

 

Smith told investigators that he met with many of Trump’s allies in the case — saying he found a level of cooperation with some of the six co-conspirators they accused of working alongside the president to block the peaceful transfer of power.

“Some of the co-conspirators met with us in proffers and did interviews with us,” Smith said.

“My staff determined that we did have evidence to charge people at a certain point in time. I had not made final determinations about that at the time that President Trump won reelection, meaning that our office was going to be closed down.”

Smith also said, had the Jan. 6 case gone to trial, he planned to bring witness after witness who voted for Trump but saw his efforts as unlawful.

“All witnesses were not going to be political enemies of the president. They were going to be political allies. We had numerous witnesses who would say, ‘I voted for President Trump. I campaigned for President Trump. I wanted him to win,’” Smith said.

Smith said they would have relied on testimony from the former Speaker of the Arizona state House, Rusty Bowers, who also testified before the House select committee that investigated Jan. 6, as well as the prior Speaker of the Michigan House. In both states, Trump and allies pressured delegates to submit false certificates declaring him the winner of the 2020 election.

 

Smith repeatedly denied any political influence in his case, saying that Trump faced charges due only to his behavior. He also said he did not have any coordination with the office of Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis (D) or Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg (D), who also brought cases against Trump.

“I entirely disagree with any characterization that our work was in any way meant to hamper him in the presidential election. I would never take orders from a political leader to hamper another person in an election. That’s not who I am,” he said.

He ultimately brought charges against Trump under four statutes.

“We wanted to make clear that this was not about trying to interfere with anyone’s First Amendment rights, that this was a fraud. And as you know, under Supreme Court precedent, fraud is not protected by the First Amendment,” he said.

“There is no historical analog for what President Trump did in this case. As we said in the indictment, he was free to say that he thought he won the election. He was even free to say falsely that he won the election. But what he was not free to do was violate federal law and use knowing — knowingly false statements about election fraud to target a lawful government function. That he was not allowed to do. And that differentiates this case from any past history.”

Smith said Trump was able to foresee the violence of Jan. 6.

“Our view of the evidence was that he caused it and that he exploited it and that it was foreseeable to him,” Smith said.

“Our evidence is that he in the weeks leading up to Jan. 6 created a level of distrust. He used that level of distrust to get people to believe fraud claims that weren’t true. He made false statements to state legislatures, to his supporters in all sorts of contexts and was aware in the days leading up to Jan. 6 that his supporters were angry when he invited them and then he directed them to the Capitol.”

Smith declined to answer whether he ever spoke to former Vice President Mike Pence in building his case, with the transcript showing the group agreed to go off the record.

But he said Trump’s social media post on Jan. 6 attacking Pence amid the riot “without question in my mind endangered the life of his own vice president.”

Smith said Trump consistently rejected information from those who said he had no legal pathway to remain in office after losing the election, saying prosecutors could show a “pattern” of Trump sidelining those aides while elevating those with fringe beliefs.

“There was a pattern in our case where any time any information came in that would mean he could no longer be president, he would reject it. And any theory, no matter how far-fetched, no matter how not based in law, that would indicate that he could, he latched on to that,” Smith said.

Smith has made multiple calls to be able to testify publicly, something special counsels are typically permitted to do after filing their final report.

House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) has not ruled that out but has yet to schedule anything.

Meanwhile, House Democrats plan to hold a hearing on the fifth anniversary of the Jan. 6 attack, reconvening its select committee for the event.

While the Mar-a-Lago volume of Smith’s report remains under seal, U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon agreed to release it on Feb. 24, but in doing so she agreed to a timeline suggested by Trump’s legal team that allows for his challenge.

Smith’s attorney, Peter Koski, argued during the deposition that Smith faced great risk by agreeing to speak with the House Judiciary Committee because the attorney has been repeatedly targeted by Trump.

“I feel compelled to make an observation about the risks of participating in this deposition. The most powerful person in the world has said that Mr. Smith should be in jail because of his work as special counsel, not because Jack did anything wrong, but because he had the audacity to follow the facts and the law and apply them to that powerful person,” Koski said.

He went on to mention an interview Trump chief of staff Susie Wiles gave to Vanity Fair where she acknowledged the president’s efforts to use the Justice Department to carry out a retribution campaign against his enemies.

“In the face of those threats, Mr. Smith appears today undaunted, comforted by the knowledge that not only did he do nothing wrong, he conducted his work as special counsel with integrity, impartiality, and an uncompromising commitment to the rule of law.”

 


The number of American citizens held in Venezuela has grown since the start of the U.S. military and economic campaign against President Nicolás Maduro

Venezuelan security forces have detained several Americans in the months since the Trump administration began a military and economic pressure campaign against the government of the South American nation, according to a U.S. official familiar with the matter.
Some of the detainees face legitimate criminal charges, while the U.S. government is considering designating at least two prisoners as wrongfully detained, according to the official. Those arrested include three Venezuelan-American dual passport holders and two American citizens with no known ties to the country, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the person was not authorized to speak publicly.
President Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela has long used detained Americans, whether guilty or innocent of serious crimes, as bargaining chips in negotiations with Washington, his greatest adversary.
 
President Trump has made the release of Americans held overseas a priority in his two presidencies, and sent his envoy, Richard Grenell, to Venezuela to negotiate a prisoner deal days after the start of his second term.

The ensuing period of talks between U.S. and Venezuelan officials resulted in the release of 17 American citizens and permanent residents held in Venezuela.
 
But the Trump administration’s decision to suspend those talks in favor of a military and economic pressure campaign against Mr. Maduro put an end to prisoner releases. The number of detained Americans in Venezuela began to rise again in the fall, according to the U.S. official. That rise coincided with the deployment of a U.S. naval armada in the Caribbean and the start of airstrikes against boats that Washington says transport drugs on Mr. Maduro’s orders.
 
The United States further escalated its pressure campaign this month, targeting tankers carrying Venezuelan oil and paralyzing the country’s biggest source of exports.
 
The U.S. Embassy in Colombia, which deals with Venezuelan affairs, declined to comment on American detainees in Venezuela, and referred questions to the U.S. State Department.
 
The State Department did not respond to requests for comment.
 
Venezuela’s Communication Ministry, which handles the government’s press requests, did not respond to a request for comment.
 
The identities of most of the Americans detained in Venezuela in recent months are unknown.
 
The family of a traveler named James Luckey-Lange of Staten Island in New York City, reported him missing soon after he crossed Venezuela’s volatile southern border in early December.
 
The U.S. official said Mr. Luckey-Lange, 28, is among the recently imprisoned and is one of the two Americans who may be designated as wrongfully detained.
 
Mr. Luckey-Lange is the son of the musician Diane Luckey, who performed as Q Lazzarus and is best known for her 1988 single “Goodbye Horses.” A travel enthusiast and amateur martial arts fighter, Mr. Luckey-Lange worked in commercial fishing in Alaska after graduating from college, according to friends and family.
A photograph of James Luckey-Lange in an orange hat and blue shirt sitting in a chair.
James Luckey-Lange, of Staten Island, N.Y., was reported missing in Venezuela by his family in early December.Credit…Eva Aridjis Fuentes

 

He embarked on a long trip across Latin America in 2022 following the death of his mother. His father died this year.

“He has been traveling around, figuring out what to do with his life,” said Eva Aridjis Fuentes, a filmmaker who worked with Mr. Luckey-Lange for a documentary about Q Lazzarus. “He has had so much loss.”

Mr. Luckey-Lange wrote in his blog in early December that he was doing research on gold mining in the Amazon region of Guyana, which borders Venezuela. On Dec. 7, he wrote a friend that he was at an unspecified location in Venezuela, and he last spoke to his family the following day. He said he was heading to Caracas, where he was planning to catch a flight on Dec. 12 that would eventually bring him home to New York.

It is unclear if Mr. Luckey-Lange had a visa to enter Venezuela, as the country’s law requires of American citizens.

His aunt and next of kin, Abbie Luckey, said in a phone interview that she has not been contacted by U.S. officials, and is seeking any information about his whereabouts.

Some American citizens who have been released from prison in Venezuela earlier this year have described abusive conditions and lack of due process. Many were not charged with any crimes, and few were convicted.

A Peruvian-American named Renzo Huamanchumo Castillo said he was detained last year after traveling to Venezuela to meet his wife’s family, and charged with terrorism and conspiring to kill Mr. Maduro.

He said the charges made no sense. “We realized afterward, I was just a token,” he added.

Mr. Huamanchumo, 48, said he was frequently beaten and received one liter of muddy water each day while detained in a notorious Venezuelan prison called Rodeo I. “It was the worst thing you can imagine,” he said.

He was freed in a prisoner swap in July.

At least two other people with U.S. ties remain imprisoned in Venezuela, according to their families: Aidel Suarez, a U.S. permanent resident born in Cuba, and Jonathan Torres Duque, a Venezuelan-American.


5 criminal cases that sum up the Trump administration’s corrupt and vindictive 2025

The Trump Justice Department’s handling of prosecutions against Eric Adams and others revealed its priorities.One of the government’s most awesome powers lies in its use of criminal law. How an administration uses that power — or chooses not to — reveals its priorities.

During Trump’s first term, he granted pardons or commutations to almost 90 people for drug-related crimes.

Since taking office in January, he has freed 10 more, including pardoning former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández, who trafficked hundreds of tons of cocaine into the U.S., and Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht, whose black-market site on the dark web generated hundreds of millions of dollars in sales of illegal goods and services, including drugs.

Bombshell report reveals Trump sent young women from Mar-a-Lago to Epstein

President Donald Trump has hinted about the falling out he had with Jeffrey Epstein after their years-long friendship, but the Wall Street Journal revealed specifics about the story in an exclusive report late Tuesday evening.

According to the report, Mar-a-Lago wasn’t merely a frequent hangout for Epstein; the country club would also send Epstein young women to handle his “massages, manicures and other spa services.”

A former Mar-a-Lago employee told the Journal that the “services” went on for years. Trump’s staff warned each other about the kind of person Epstein was, according to former Epstein employees.

The spa employees would frequently warn each other about Epstein’s sexual suggestions, reporting that he would expose himself during appointments.

Epstein was never a dues-paying member of Mar-a-Lago, but Trump still gave his close friends the perks. He even went so far as to tell the spa staff to treat Epstein as if he was a dues-paying member. Epstein’s longtime companion, Ghislaine Maxwell, would frequently book the appointments on his behalf.

Everything stopped when an 18-year-old beautician returned from a “house call” to Epstein and said that he had pressured her for sex, the ex-employees told the Journal.

“A manager sent Trump a fax relaying the employee’s allegations and urged him to ban Epstein, some of the former employees said. Trump told the manager it was a good letter and said to kick him out,” the report said.

The woman gave details to human resources, but the incident was never reported to the police.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt alleged the report was false.

“No matter how many times this story is told and retold, the truth remains: President Trump did nothing wrong and he kicked Jeffrey Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago for being a creep,” Leavitt said after claiming the Journal was “writing up fallacies and innuendo.”

Trump is currently in a lawsuit against the Journal for a report that Trump submitted a note for Epstein’s birthday book that included the outline of a woman’s body. Trump denied the report even as the birthday book entries were published.

CNBC’s Carl Quintanilla highlighted an excerpt of the report that talked about Trump’s ex-wife, Marla Maples, being so “uneasy” about Epstein’s presence that she didn’t want to spend time with him or Trump when they were together. Still, Epstein continued to party at Mar-a-Lago with Trump.

Mother Jones editor-in-chief Clara Jeffrey cited the ongoing lawsuit between Trump and the Journal. The paper, she said, “continues to break news about their relationship…”

Washington Monthly’s politics editor Bill Scher said he was speechless reading that Trump was willing to send young women to Epstein’s mansion.

Linguist Luke Steuber remarked, “WSJ just blew this all up by carrying Trump’s water. On a lot of people, I think it’s going to work.”

National security analyst Marcy Wheeler added, “What’s interesting abt this story is 18-yo who returned to MAL saying Epstein had pressured her for sex is not clearly IDed as girl whose father was MAL member who really let Trump have it. She could still be, but if not, it would be THREE (known) MAL girls Epstein assaulted before he was reported.”


Trump mocks Kennedy family hours after JFK granddaughter Tatiana Schlossberg dies at age 35

.© Reach Publishing Services Limited

Just hours after it was announced that John F Kennedy’s 35-year-old granddaughter Tatiana Schlossberg died after being diagnosed with leukemia, President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social of MAGA supporters insulting the Kennedys for their response to the president’s move to add his own name to the Kennedy Center.

 

Trump shared screenshots of MAGA supporters insulting the Kennedys for their response to his recent decision to add his own name to the Kennedy Center

“The Kennedys have plenty of buildings, schools and airports named after them. Adding Trump’s name is entirely appropriate,” a user wrote.

• Tatiana Schlossberg, JFK’s granddaughter, dies of cancer at 35

• Musician faces $1M lawsuit after canceling Kennedy Center Christmas show over renaming

“The Trumps have always been supporters of the arts. The Kennedys are supporters of the Kennedys,” another read.

Trump did not directly mention Tatiana or her death in the Truth Social post.


‘Alarm bells’: New poll is bad for Trump

A new AtlasIntel poll shows 54.4% of likely voters would choose the Democratic ticket and 38.4% would back the Republican ticket if midterms were held today, a 16-point advantage for Democrats.

The poll also finds President Donald Trump’s net approval at minus 20 points, with 39.3% approving and 59.6% disapproving.


Drugmakers raise US prices on 350 medicines despite pressure from Trump

 

NEW YORK, Dec 31 (Reuters) – Drugmakers plan to raise U.S. prices on at least 350 branded medications including vaccines against COVID, RSV and shingles and blockbuster cancer treatment Ibrance, even as the Trump administration pressures them for cuts, according to data provided exclusively by healthcare research firm 3 Axis Advisors.

The number of price increases for 2026 is up from the same point last year, when drugmakers unveiled plans for raises on more than 250 drugs. The median of this year’s price hikes is around 4% – in line with 2025.

The increases do not reflect any rebates to pharmacy benefit managers and other discounts.

DRUGMAKERS ALSO CUT SOME PRICES

Drugmakers also plan to cut the list prices on around nine drugs. That includes a more than 40% cut for Boehringer Ingelheim’s diabetes drug Jardiance and three related treatments.

Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly, which sell Jardiance together, did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the reason for the price cuts.

Jardiance is among the 10 drugs for which the U.S. government negotiated a lower price for the Medicare program for people aged 65 and older in 2026. Under those negotiations, Boehringer and Lilly slashed the Jardiance price by two-thirds.

U.S. patients currently pay by far the most for prescription medicines, often nearly three times more than in other developed nations, and Trump has been pressuring drugmakers to lower their prices to what patients pay in similarly wealthy nations.

The increases on 350 medicines come even as Trump has struck deals with 14 drugmakers on prices of some of their medicines for the government’s Medicaid program for low-income Americans and for cash payers. Pfizer, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis and GSK are among those companies and also plan to raise prices on some drugs on January 1.

“These deals are being announced as transformative when, in fact, they really just nibble around the margins in terms of what is really driving high prices for prescription drugs in the U.S.,” said Dr. Benjamin Rome, a health policy researcher at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston.

Rome said the companies seem to be maximizing prices while negotiating discounts behind the scenes with health and drug insurers and then setting yet another price for direct-to-consumer cash-pay sales.

An HHS spokesman declined to comment.

KEEPING UP WITH INFLATION

Pfizer announced the most list price hikes, on around 80 different drugs including cancer drug Ibrance, migraine pill Nurtec, and COVID treatment Paxlovid, as well as some administered in hospitals such as morphine and hydromorphone.

Most of Pfizer’s increases are below 10%, except for a 15% hike of COVID vaccine Comirnaty, while some of its relatively inexpensive hospital drugs saw more than four-fold increases.

Pfizer said in a statement it had adjusted the average list price of its innovative medicines and vaccines for 2026 below the overall rate of inflation.

“The modest increase is necessary to support investments that allow us to continue to discover and deliver new medicines as well as address increased costs throughout our business,” the company said.

Larger U.S. drug price increases were once far more common. Drugmakers have scaled them back due to criticism from lawmakers and new government policies, such as penalizing companies that charge Medicare program prices that rise faster than inflation.

European drugmaker GSK plans to increase prices on around 20 drugs and vaccines from 2% to 8.9%. The drugmaker said it is committed to reasonable prices and the hikes are needed to support scientific innovation.

Sanofi and Novartis did not respond to requests for comment.

More price hikes and cuts can be expected in early January, which is historically the biggest month for drugmakers to raise prices.

3 Axis is a consulting firm that works with pharmacist groups, health plans and some pharmaceutical industry-related groups on drug pricing and supply chain issues. It is a related entity to, and shares staff with, drug pricing non-profit 46brooklyn.


MAGA panics over new photos of president’s ‘decay’

 
'Trump is in better shape than most!' MAGA panics over new photos of president's 'decay'
 
Adhesive bandages on U.S. President Donald Trump’s right hand as he gestures during a roundtable discussion on the day he announced an aid package for farmers, at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., December 8, 2025. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
 

President Donald Trump’s health was called into question Sunday after new photographs revealed additional discoloration on the president’s hands, though the president’s supporters quick to rush to his defense and insist that Trump’s health was unmatched.

Captured by professional photojournalist Andrew Caballero-Reynolds, one of the photos shows Trump with visible discoloration on both hands, whereas previously, Trump had only been seen with prominent discoloration and bruising on his right hand, something the White House said was caused by Trump “shaking hands all day, every day.”

With discoloration now visible on both hands, critics raised renewed questions about the state of Trump’s health, as have “many in Washington,” according to a recent report that revealed “Trump’s own decay” was a frequent topic of discussion in the U.S. Capitol. As for Trump’s followers, however, such as prominent MAGA influencer Paul Szypula, Trump’s health couldn’t be better.

“President Trump is in better shape than most people half his age,” Szypula wrote in a social media post Sunday on X to his more than 372,000 followers.

“Nothing burger” wrote another, X user “RubyTubee,” a self-described “MAGA conservative” who’s amassed nearly 12,000 followers.

At 79, Trump is the single-oldest sitting U.S. president in history, and critics have noted what appear to be increasingly frequent signs of potential health struggles, including the aforementioned hand bruising, as well as his swollen ankles and increasing instances of rambling during speeches.

Trump’s recent MRI scan has raised further questions as to the state of his health, with a former White House doctor having cast doubt on the White House’s official explanation for the MRI scan.

Nevertheless, Trump’s supporters continued to launch attacks on critics questioning the president’s health.

“This is what passes for political analysis now,” wrote
 
Johnathon Corcoran, an active X user with nearly 5,000 followers who frequently shares MAGA and pro-Trump content.
Not only was Trump’s right hand discolored on Christmas Eve, but it appears his left hand is now discolored too

‘It’s insane’: Expert makes stunning claim about Trump’s chat with Zelenskyy

'It's insane': Expert makes stunning claim about Trump's chat with Zelenskyy
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks next to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy upon his arrival for meetings at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, U.S., December 28, 2025. REUTERS/Jonathan Erns
A military expert revealed on Sunday that President Donald Trump is taking an “insane” approach to ending the war in Ukraine. Trump held another round of peace talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at Mar-a-Lago on Sunday, where the two leaders discussed the current 20-point peace plan that is on the table. Ahead of Trump’s chat with Zelenskyy, the president said he had a phone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin following a night of heavy bombing by Russian forces against Ukrainian civilians. Tom Nichols, a staff writer for The Atlantic, said in an interview on MS NOW’s “Alex Witt Reports” that Trump appears to be trying to play the intermediary between Putin and Zelenskyy, a strategy that he said shows either that Trump doesn’t understand the conflict or that he is lying about his efforts to end it. “From the point of diplomatic practice, it’s insane,” Nicols said. You don’t check in with the aggressor when you’re talking to a putative friend and ally, and you don’t report in afterwards. You talk with your friends, with your allies, with Ukraine, and then you tell the Russians, ‘Here’s the offer. Here’s what you need to do.'” “And instead, it’s almost like Trump is acting like an intermediary, trying to express Putin’s wishes to Zelenskyy and to the world, which is what he did after the Alaska summit,” Nichols continued. “It’s what he does every time he gets off the phone with Putin. The fact is, Vladimir Putin has this hold over Donald Trump that makes Trump and the American government into basically a de facto ally of Russia.”

Trump just issued a foul warning

On Christmas of all days, Donald Trump chose to call Democrats “scum.” Not criminals. Not misguided. Not wrong. Scum. A word we usually reserve for things we scrape off the bottom of a shoe or skim off polluted water. A word whose entire purpose is to dehumanize. That moment matters far beyond the day’s news cycle, and far beyond partisan politics. It matters because leaders don’t just govern; they model. Psychologists and social and political scientists have long pointed out that national leaders function, at a deep emotional level, as parental figures for their nations. They set the boundaries of what is acceptable. They establish norms. They shape the emotional climate children grow up breathing. America has lived through this before, both for good and, now, for ill. Franklin Delano Roosevelt understood this instinctively. In the depths of the Great Depression and the terror of World War II, he spoke to the country as a calm, steady parent. His fireside chats didn’t just convey policy; they conveyed reassurance, dignity, and solidarity. He treated Americans as adults capable of courage and sacrifice. He named fear without exploiting it. The result was not weakness, but national resilience. A generation raised under that moral tone went on to build the modern middle class, defeat fascism, and help construct a postwar world that valued democracy, human rights, and shared prosperity. Contrast that with the bigoted, hateful, revenge-filled claptrap children have heard for the past decade from the emotionally stunted psychopath currently occupying the White House. Hours after calling you and me “scum,” he put up another post calling us “sleazebags.” How presidential. Presidents like Dwight D. Eisenhower warned Americans about the dangers of concentrated power and the military-industrial complex, modeling restraint and foresight. John F. Kennedy appealed to service, famously asking what we could do for our country. Lyndon Johnson, for all his flaws, used the moral authority of the presidency to push civil rights forward, telling America that discrimination was not just illegal but wrong. Even Ronald Reagan, whose policies I fiercely opposed, spoke a language of civic belonging and optimism rather than open dehumanization. Go back further, to the Founders themselves, and George Washington warned against factional hatred and the corrosive effects of treating political opponents as enemies rather than fellow citizens. John Adams argued that a republic could only survive if it was grounded in virtue and moral responsibility. Thomas Jefferson wrote that every generation must renew its commitment to liberty, not surrender it to demagogues who feed on division. They all understood something Trump doesn’t, or is so obsessively wrapped up in himself and his own infantile grievances that he doesn’t care about: the psychological power of example. Donald Trump has spent ten years modeling for America the exact opposite of leadership. Ten years of cruelty framed as strength. Ten years of mockery, insults, and grievance elevated to the highest office in the land. Ten years of praising strongmen, including Putin, Xi, and Orbán, while attacking democratic institutions. Ten years of targeting Hispanics, Black Somali immigrants, demonizing refugees, and encouraging suspicion and hatred toward entire communities. And now he’s giving us the example of using ICE not simply as a law enforcement agency, but as a masked, armed, unaccountable weapon of state terror aimed not only at brown-skinned families, but at journalists, clergy, lawyers, and anyone else who dares to document their abuse. Kids graduating from high school this year have never known anything else. That fact should alarm every parent. Children learn what leadership looks like long before they understand policy debates. They absorb emotional cues, and notice who gets rewarded and who gets punished. When a president calls fellow Americans “scum” and suffers no consequences, the lesson is clear: cruelty is permissible if you have power. Empathy is expendable. Democracy is a nuisance. Accountability is optional. This is how normalization works. What once would have been unthinkable becomes routine. The outrage dulls. The abnormal becomes background noise. And a generation grows up believing this is simply how adults in authority behave. History tells us where that road leads: dehumanizing language precedes dehumanizing actions. Every authoritarian movement begins by teaching people to see their neighbors as less than fully human. Once empathy vanishes, abuses become easier to justify, and violence becomes easier to excuse. That’s why we all — parents, grandparents, and citizens — have a special responsibility right now. We can’t assume our nation’s children will automatically recognize how dangerous and abnormal this moment is; instead, we have to name it for them. We have to tell them, plainly and repeatedly, that this is not what healthy leadership looks like. That calling people “scum” and “sleazebags” is not strength. That praising autocrats while undermining democracy is not patriotism. That power without empathy is not leadership; it’s merely a simple pathology known as psychopathy. And we must model something better ourselves. Disagree without dehumanizing. Stand up without tearing others down. Teach that democracy, in order to work, depends on mutual recognition of one another’s humanity. Remind our kids that America has, in its best moments, been led by people who understood their role as moral examples, not just political operators. And that when CBS, Fox “News,” the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, Facebook, X, and other billionaire-owned rightwing media and social media pretend this is normal, they’re spitting on the graves of our Founders and participating in a gross violation of the basic norms of human decency. Trump’s Christmas message wasn’t just offensive. It was a warning. The future lays before us now, and if we care about the country our children will inherit, we can’t let this moral vandalism to go unanswered.

The United States military bombed Nigeria on Christmas, reportedly targeting ISIS militants. President Donald Trump claimed the U.S. struck terrorists “who have been targeting and viciously killing, primarily, innocent Christians, at levels not seen for many years, and even Centuries.”

Nigeria has been plagued by sectarian violence, but that violence hasn’t primarily targeted Christians — and certainly not at historically unprecedented levels. America’s logic here isn’t clear, but the strikes appear driven more by Trump putting on a show for his evangelical base than trying to reduce violence in Nigeria or even advance U.S. national interests.

It’s the first time the U.S. has ever fired missiles into Nigeria, but it’s one of several countries the Trump administration has bombed this year. In 2025, U.S. forces launched more than a thousand strikes against the Houthis in Yemen, more than a hundred in Somalia mostly targeting al-Shabab, dozens against ISIS in Syria, 29 and counting against alleged drug traffickers in the Caribbean and the eastern Pacific, plus some strikes targeting Iran’s nuclear program. All of those efforts killed people and damaged things, but none appear to have achieved anything lasting.

Nigeria is a U.S. counterterrorism partner.


ICE Agents Arrest Man on Christmas Eve—and Then Steal His Groceries

Trump’s immigration agents are doing whatever they want.

Two ICE agents walk down a neighborhood sidewalk with Christmas deocrations.
Christopher Dilts/Bloomberg/Getty Images
 

Immigrations and Customs Enforcement officers in Yakima, Washington, spent Christmas Eve arresting a man in a Walmart parking lot—even taking his already purchased groceries for themselves.

Four ICE officers in masks and tactical gear can be seen in a video surrounding a man with a car full of food while he loads it into his car. A woman watching the arrest asked ICE if she could take down the phone number of the man’s wife to let her know her husband had been detained. The ICE agents refused.

“No, guess he should’ve complied,” an agent said.

The agents then start to divvy up the man’s groceries, as the bystander tells them they had previously detained and deported her husband. “I fucking hate these motherfuckers,” the woman filming says as they drive off—presumably to the nearby Yakima ICE Detention Center.

 

Masked men abducting people and looting their groceries is unfortunately par for the course as the first year of President Trump’s mass deportation campaign draws to a close.

Justice Department Says Filming Immigration Raids Is ‘Domestic Terrorism’

A leaked Justice Department memo directs federal prosecutors to press “domestic terrorism” charges against individuals who record immigration operations.

 | 

After leaving the Chicago area in November, U.S. Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino made an unexpected return on December 16, along with several hundred federal agents and a film crew. Returning to the same aggressive tactics that sparked protests earlier this year, local officials criticized Bovino for using immigration operations as a form of political theater.

In a statement to the Chicago Sun-Times, a spokesperson for Democratic Mayor Brandon Johnson called out agents for allegedly arresting people indiscriminately and without arrest warrants. The mayor’s office also criticized them for filming the raids and “[turning] these operations into a spectacle.”

“This activity is occurring alongside a film crew, which appears to be using these raids to create content at the expense of traumatizing families,” said the spokesperson. “These tactics are destabilizing, wrong, and must be condemned.”

But this is not the first time a federal agency has filmed immigration operations for political theater. In addition to being tasked with carrying out record levels of deportations, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) under President Donald Trump has seemingly been transformed into a propaganda arm to sell the public on the president’s increasingly unpopular immigration policies. Examples include a video posted on X by DHS Secretary Kristi Noem of agents raiding a South Shore apartment building on September 30 and a video posted on the DHS’ official Instagram account depicting various immigration arrests.

As Bovino and the DHS have embraced the power of cinema to document immigration arrests and promote current policies, the Trump administration is also cracking down on individuals who choose to record immigration operations. In a December 4 memo, originally leaked by journalist Ken Klippenstein, the Justice Department encourages federal prosecutors to press “domestic terrorism” charges against people for “doxing” law enforcement officers. While undefined in the memo, “doxing” in this context is understood to mean the publishing of information that identifies law enforcement officers, which the Justice Department insinuates is a threatening activity used to “silence opposing speech, limit political activity, change or direct policy outcomes, and prevent the functioning of a democratic society.”

This definition mirrors previous statements by DHS officials earlier this year, including a statement made by Noem in July: “Violence is anything that threatens [agents] and their safety, so it’s doxing them, it’s videotaping them where they’re at when they’re out on operations.”

However, much of what the Trump administration tries to paint as the unacceptable “doxing” of law enforcement agents is often observers merely recording on-duty officers—an activity firmly protected by the First Amendment when no physical interference or danger is present, and an important tool for holding public officials accountable. By broadly defining domestic terrorism to include something as vague as “doxing,” the Trump administration has rolled out a “nationwide policy of intimidating and threatening people who attempt to observe and record DHS operations,” according to David Bier, the director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute.

Under such a broad definition, even the DHS’ own camera crews and media hired specifically to record and publish details of immigration operations could potentially be prosecuted for domestic terrorism. The only limiting factor in the memo seems to be whether the publisher is considered Trump’s political ally or opponent, i.e., an “Antifa-aligned extremist,” which the December 4 memo defines, in part, as someone with “extreme viewpoints on immigration,” such as “mass migration and open borders.”

But the right to free speech isn’t taken away when someone says or does something that the government disagrees with. Attempting to define who is and isn’t protected by the First Amendment is not only unconstitutional, but also a strategy that could put even Trump’s allies at the mercy of federal prosecutors.

 


Trump has given many reasons to dislike wind farms, but so far none are backed by agreed-upon facts. Here’s a look at his views:

  • “If you have a windmill anywhere near your house, congratulations, your house just went down 75 percent in value,” he said in 2019. “And they say the noise causes cancer.”
  • “If you love birds, you’d never want to walk under a windmill because it’s a very sad, sad sight. It’s like a cemetery,” he continued. “In California, if you shoot a bald eagle, they put you in jail for five years. And yet the windmills, they wipe them all out.”
    (I have been under many wind turbines, not a single bird)
  • “The windmills are driving the whales crazy, obviously,” he said in January.

(Maybe, but the administration has also weakened habitat protections, ended automatic protections for threatened species and said economic factors should take priority in decisions about endangered species.)

Other rationales

In explaining a range of new policies, the president has pointed to grounds that don’t draw from evidence, or at least not evidence the public can see.

Wind farms: These need to be stopped because of radar “clutter.” See above.

Illegal immigrants: Some have been selected for deportation because the government has said they belong to a gang — without proving it.

Boat strikes: The administration says the nearly 100 boats destroyed off South America were running drugs to the United States. It hasn’t released any evidence for that claim.

National Guard deployments: Trump says protesters in a number of Democratic-led cities have threatened the safety of immigration agents and government facilities. Judges have chastised officials for not providing evidence for these assertions.

Alien Enemies Act: The administration says the presence of Venezuelan gang members in the United States constitutes an “invasion” by a “hybrid criminal state” that allows him to invoke this wartime law, reminds my colleague Mattathias Schwartz, who covers legal affairs. But U.S. intelligence agencies have said Venezuela is not directing gang activity.

Refugees: Trump has shut down most refugee admissions but is letting in white Afrikaners based on a claim of genocide against them that is not backed by evidence, says my colleague Zolan Kanno-Youngs, who covers the White House.

Liberal nonprofits: Vice President JD Vance and others say these groups support political violence — again without providing evidence.

It all adds up to what you might call a governance of assertion. That is: Trust, but don’t verify.



The video tRump does not want us to see:

Video


tRump is going after Greenland again.




ICE Data Reveals What Happened to 1,600 People Arrested During Chicago’s Blitz

Most of those arrested were swiftly shuttled to a sprawling array of detention centers in 13 states, many with reports of troubling conditions.

Sheriff’s officers in brown uniforms stand in front of a white bus in motion in a parking lot.
 
Detainees are transported from the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Broadview, Ill., outside Chicago, in October 2025 during “Operation Midway Blitz.” 

As federal agents descend on Chicago this week for a renewed round of immigration raids, a Marshall Project analysis shows what happened to around 1,600 people arrested in a similar operation this fall. Our reporting reveals how federal agencies moved them through the Trump administration’s expanded network of detention facilities — many rife with complaints of inhumane conditions.

The analysis of recently released Immigration and Customs Enforcement data found that Illinois saw the sharpest increase in ICE arrests of any U.S. state in the first five weeks after the blitz began. And those who were arrested were quickly shuttled to a sprawling array of detention facilities that cut a wide swath down the middle of the country.

When federal agents launched “Operation Midway Blitz” in September, they arrested thousands of people, at times near schools or child care centers, and used chemical agents like tear gas on protesters. In response to the often chaotic and high-profile raids, city residents blew whistles to alert neighbors of approaching agents and organized “magic school buses” to accompany children to school.

The Marshall Project analyzed ICE data that includes arrests and detentions through the middle of October, the most current detailed records publicly available. People who ICE arrested during that time were later detained in 13 states, at county jails, privately run detention centers and a rapidly constructed facility on a military base, the data shows.

“Without that infrastructure, without mass detention, you can’t carry out mass raids or mass deportation,” said Stacy Suh, program director at Detention Watch Network, a coalition of grassroots organizations that seeks to end immigration detention.

The ICE data, obtained by the Deportation Data Project, allowed The Marshall Project to trace individuals as they were transferred between facilities, and in some cases, deported.

President Donald Trump has rapidly ramped up immigration arrests in an attempt to deport 1 million people in his first year back in office. At the same time, a new Department of Homeland Security policy denies detainees the right to bond hearings in immigration court, leading the number of people in detention to reach record-highs.

 

Arrests in Illinois grew more sharply than in any other state

From the start of “Operation Midway Blitz” through mid-October, arrests in Illinois surged compared with a similar period preceding the surge.

 

Examining the records of people who were arrested in the Chicago area, The Marshall Project found that nearly all of them were first held at a facility in Broadview, Illinois, a suburb west of the city. In November, a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order compelling ICE to address conditions there.

The order cites “serious conditions” at the facility, similar to those reported at detention centers across the nation, and requires ICE to provide access to sleeping space, bedding, toiletries, medication, regularly cleaned areas, regular meals, telephone calls and clear information about paperwork the government asks detainees to sign.

The suburban facility, which has been the site of a lot of protests against the immigration raids, was the first stop for many who were arrested off the street as federal agents moved through the region. Dayanne Figueroa, a U.S. citizen who was pulled from her SUV by federal agents in a Chicago neighborhood, was detained at the Broadview facility. Figueroa, who was recovering from kidney surgeries when she was taken to Broadview, told Congress that she “begged for help” but was ignored by agents and “thrown into a filthy jail cell,” until blood in her urine prompted them to get her medical care.

 

From Chicago into ICE’s detention network

After ICE arrested immigrants in the Chicago area the agency transferred them to dozens of facilities around the country, including county jails, repurposed private prisons and a site on a military base. 

 
 

After being booked into ICE custody, more than 380 people arrested in the Chicago area were transported to a recently revived detention facility in the rural town of Baldwin, Michigan. The facility, North Lake Processing Center, tops the list of places where the most people were held in the first weeks of the Operation Midway Blitz raids.

North Lake, which is run by GEO Group, was previously a federal prison until the Biden administration ended Department of Justice contracts with private prison companies. It reopened in June under a new contract with the Department of Homeland Security, becoming the largest immigration detention center in the Midwest.

Nahomi Ramirez, whose father is detained there, said North Lake still looks and feels like the prison it once was.

“It’s concrete walls, it’s barbed wire fences everywhere, like for no one to escape,” Ramirez said. “I haven’t even fully processed that in my brain, to be honest.”

A man with a medium skin tone and a gray mustache sits in the driver’s seat of a semitruck. He is wearing a black beanie with orange text.

Fernando Ramirez was arrested in Indiana and is currently detained at North Lake Processing Center in Michigan. 

Her father, Fernando Ramirez, a semitruck driver arrested in Indiana, told her he was moved to a freezing-cold, filthy ward with other people who have diabetes. The detainees in the ward were not always fed on time, which caused their blood sugar to crash, Ramirez said, and her father’s allergy to the blankets in his room has left him huddling under his jacket for warmth.

U.S. Rep. Rashida Tlaib of Michigan has reported receiving similar complaints from North Lake detainees about inadequate food, lack of medical care and freezing temperatures, as well as visitation issues, lack of access to legal counsel and suicide attempts. The concerns prompted her to visit the facility.

Since Trump’s second term began, more privately run immigration facilities have opened, or reopened, around the U.S. to keep up with the pace of raids and detentions. Meanwhile, advocates have warned of inhumane conditions for detainees.

Eighteen people, more than half of them children, arrested in the Chicago area were transferred to the Dilley Immigration Processing Center in Texas, run by CoreCivic. President Joe Biden ended the practice of detaining children with their families in 2021, but Trump recently reversed that policy and resumed operations.

Families at Dilley have testified in court filings to troubling conditions, including worms and mold in food and little access to education or recreation for children. They said their children were so distressed that they had hit their own faces and soiled themselves, despite being potty-trained.

 

In 2021, Illinois banned local jails from supplying detention space to ICE, leaving the agency to rely on neighboring states instead.

At least 300 people from the Chicago raids went through the Clay County Justice Center in Indiana, a jail that has long relied on federal detention contracts to supplement the county budget. After a heated public debate, Clay County opened up a new, 285-bed wing last year to house immigrants. ICE book-ins at the jail nearly tripled in the first half of the year, according to the IndyStar.

As a part of a lawsuit filed in 2022, attorneys for detainees claim the jail wrongfully passed inspection in violation of ICE standards and that ICE’s lack of oversight has allowed the county to misappropriate funds meant for the care and custody of people detained.

Robin Valenzuela, co-founder of Indiana AID, which supports immigrants detained in the state, said even with the expansion, the Clay County facility is overcrowded. People have developed infections from sleeping on floors, she said, and are not being provided with enough hygiene products during menstruation.

The conditions and the indefinitely long stays in detention have led many detainees to sign “voluntary departure” agreements to leave the U.S., she said.

“This whole thing is about deterrence,” Valenzuela said. “So it’s like, how can we make people as miserable as possible in these facilities so that they just say, ‘Screw it, I want to leave.’”

Other counties in Indiana are also cashing in on federal contracts. Immigration detention expanded to four more Indiana county jails this year, according to an analysis from the National Immigrant Justice Center. Data shows Marion County Jail in Indianapolis held at least 42 people arrested in the Chicago raids.

Noelle Smart, principal research associate at the Vera Institute of Justice, said ICE significantly expanded its jail contracts as the agency ramps up enforcement, and that it is increasingly relying on transfers to out-of-state facilities, particularly when it lacks detention space nearby.

 

Anew Texas detention center, mostly composed of gigantic tents, is an archetype for the kinds of large facilities the Trump administration plans to continue building. More than 50 people arrested around Chicago during the federal enforcement blitz were last held at Camp East Montana before they were deported. The grounds, located on the Fort Bliss military base in El Paso, Texas, began holding immigrants in August, before its construction was finished.

More than 100 Chicago detainees remained there in mid-October. By the end of November, the camp hit an average daily population of over 2,700.

An aerial view shows a campus of long, white tents in a desert with a mountain range in the distance.

The Camp East Montana detention facility at Fort Bliss military base in El Paso, Texas, in September 2025. 

In the few months that it has been operational, the camp has been the subject of reports of abuse and dangerous conditions. In September, The Washington Post reported that an internal ICE inspection report showed it failed to meet at least 60 detention standards.

This month, civil rights groups sent a letter to federal officials detailing abuses based on interviews with dozens of people detained at Fort Bliss. The letter claimed federal officers used threats of violence in an attempt to force detainees to cross the border into Mexico, despite having migrated from Cuba. The letter also details reports of sexual abuse, toilets overflowing into sleeping areas, and detainees being denied access to medication and adequate food.

The family of Victor Miranda, a landscaper from the South Side of Chicago arrested during the blitz, said his medical conditions worsened after his transfer to Fort Bliss. Miranda’s 16-year-old daughter, Ashley, said her father has not had proper meals or been given the breathing equipment he uses to sleep.

“They keep calling them criminals, and they tell them there that the lawyers aren’t going to do anything for them,” said Ashley, translating for her mother, who speaks Spanish. “That you have no chance, you should just give up.”

Miranda is one of hundreds of people detained during the Chicago raids who were allegedly arrested by ICE without warrants.

On Dec. 11, a federal appeals court blocked the collective release of people arrested without warrants in Illinois and other states covered by a consent decree — but said a judge could review individual cases to determine who should be freed. If the Trump administration appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court, that could create more obstacles and delays.

In the meantime, Chicago residents and community organizations are readying themselves for more raids and arrests with the return of the federal blitz.

Erin Tobes, a stay-at-home mother in the Bowmanville neighborhood, launched a mutual aid committee with other mothers that organized rapid response tactics during the first spate of raids. The group continues to support families of people detained and deported by creating GoFundMes, coordinating legal representation and providing staples like diapers and food.

“I’m proud to be able to put that forward and let my kids know that I’m out there working with the community,” Tobes said. “And that they are safe, their friends are safe, and we’re going to do everything we can to help them.”

A hell of a campaign slogan for Dems running next November

It’s time to end the predator-state coalition in America, of which this is just one glaring example.

Ever since five corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court ruled that “money is free speech” protected by the First Amendment and “corporations are persons” protected by the entire Bill of Rights, pretty much every industry in America has poured cash into politicians’ and judges’ pockets to be able to freely rip us off. Or, in the case of the gun industry, kill our children.

Even though a clear majority of Americans want stronger gun laws, our politicians have colluded with the gun industry to give us the exact opposite, as I detail in The Hidden History of Guns and the Second Amendment.

But it’s not just the gun industry.

When greedy banksters crashed our economy in 2008, Bush made sure not a single one went to prison, in stark contrast to the S&L scandal/crash in the 1980s: between 1988 and 1992 the Department of Justice sent 1,706 banksters to prison and obtained 2,603 guilty verdicts for fraud in financial institutions.

In 2008, however, after Bush and his cronies cashed their “contribution” checks, hundreds of banksters walked away with million- and even billion-dollar bonuses. Steve Mnuchin, who allegedly threw over 30,000 people out of their homes with robo-signed documents, was even appointed Treasury Secretary by Donald Trump and later given a billion dollars by the Saudis to invest.

Are you regularly hearing about these horrors on social media? Probably not, because prior to 1996, social media companies (then it was mostly CompuServe and AOL) had to hire people like me and Nigel Peacock to monitor their forums, make sure people followed the rules and told the truth. Nobody was the victim of online predators, and the company didn’t run secret algorithms to push rightwing memes at you and shadow-ban progressive content.

That year, however, after generous contributions to both parties, Congress passed a bill that gave Zuck and his buddies almost complete immunity from liability, which is why social media is now so dangerously toxic that Australia just banned it for kids.

Similarly, every other democracy in the world does your taxes for you and then lets you know their math so you can check it. In several European countries it’s so simple it’s basically a postcard; you only respond if you think they’re in error. The US is the only developed country on Earth where there’s a multi-billion-dollar industry preparing people’s tax returns for them.

For example, in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland returns are pre-filled and can be approved via text message or an online portal in minutes. In Germany, the Netherlands, the UK, and France tax forms are similarly filled out in advance by the government; you just sign and mail them back. And in Estonia, widely seen as a digital government pioneer, filing taxes takes minutes and is done with a simple online form that a fifth grader could complete.

Here in the US, Democrats thought this was a fine idea — it would save time and money for both taxpayers and the IRS — and so Biden rolled out a program where people with few deductions could simply file their taxes online for free.

Republicans, however, being on the take from the billion-dollar tax preparation industry, objected; they didn’t want the financial gravy train to stop because that would mean less of the money charged us for tax prep would end up in their campaign coffers, not to mention the fancy vacations, meals, and other lobbying benefits they can get.

So, the Trump administration announced — after tax prep company Intuit “donated” $1 million to Trump’s “inaugural” slush fund — that they’re killing off the free filing option; going forward, pretty much everybody must either learn enough tax law to deal with the IRS themselves or pay a tax preparation company.

And then there’s the health insurance industry, a giant blood-sucking tick attached to our collective backs that made $74 billion in profits (in addition to the billions paid to its most senior executives) last year by denying us payments for doctors’ visits, tests, procedures, surgeries, and even organ transplants.

Most Americans have no idea that the United States is quite literally the only country in the developed world that doesn’t define healthcare as an absolute right for all of its citizens and thus provide it at low or no cost.

That’s it. We’re the only one left. We’re the only country in the entire developed world where somebody getting sick can leave a family bankrupt, destitute, and homeless.

A half-million American families are wiped out every year so completely that they lose everything and must declare bankruptcy just because somebody got sick. The number of health-expense-related bankruptcies in all the other developed countries in the world combined is zero.

Yet the United States spends more on “health care” than any other country in the world: about 17 percent of GDP. Switzerland, Germany, France, Sweden and Japan all average around 11 percent, and Canada, Denmark, Belgium, Austria, Norway, Netherlands, United Kingdom, New Zealand, and Australia all come in between 9.3 percent and 10.5 percent.

Health insurance premiums right now make up about 22 percent of all taxable payroll (and don’t even cover all working people), whereas Medicare For All would run an estimated 10 percent and would cover every man, woman, and child in America. And don’t get me started on the Medicare Advantage scam the Bush administration created that’s routinely ripping off seniors and destroying actual Medicare.

And if disease doesn’t get us, hunger might. One-in-five American children live in “food insecure” households and frequently go to bed hungry at a time Trump and Republicans are cutting SNAP and WIC benefits and grants to food banks.

The amount of money that America’s richest four billionaires (Musk, Bezos, Gates, Zuckerberg) added to their money bins since 2020 because of the Reagan/Bush/Trump tax cuts is over $300 billion: the cost to entirely end child poverty in America is an estimated $25 billion.

And, because of the body and brain damage hunger and malnutrition are doing to one-in-five American children, child hunger in the US is costing our society an estimated $167.5 billion a year in lost opportunity and productivity.

So, why do we avoid spending $25 billion to solve a $167.5 billion problem? Because of the predator-state coalition, which was legalized and enabled by five corrupt on-the-take Republicans on the US Supreme Court.

The predators don’t want you to know this stuff, of course, which is why they’ve bought up or started over 1500 radio stations, hundreds of TV stations, multiple TV networks, multiple major and local newspapers, and thousands of websites to bathe us in a continuous slurry of rightwing b——- and pro-industry talking points.

And then there are the monopolies that Reagan legalized in 1983 and the Bush and Trump administrations have encouraged. Before that, we had competition within industries, and most malls and downtowns were filled with locally-owned businesses and stores.

Grocery stores, airlines, banks, social media, retail stores, gas stations, car manufacturers, insurance companies, internet providers (ISPs), computer companies, phone companies, hospital chains: the list goes on and on.

All — because of their monopoly or oligopoly status — cost the average American family an average of over $5,000 a year that is not paid by the citizens of any other developed country in the world because the rest of the world won’t tolerate this kind of predatory, monopolistic behavior.

Trump has even managed to turn immigration into a predatory scheme, transferring hundreds of billions of dollars from social programs to a masked, secret police force and Republican-aligned private prison contractors, as he gleefully inflicts brutality on dark-skinned immigrants and American citizens alike.

It’s time to roll back the predatory state, and it’d make a hell of a campaign slogan for Democrats running next November and in 2028. End Corporate Personhood and the legal bribery of politicians and judges.


‘Neither of those things is true’: Trump’s niece upbraids her uncle’s latest ‘travesty’

President Donald Trump is increasingly positioning the United States as an outright opponent of the European Union and the global democratic order, wrote his niece Mary Trump in an urgent article on her Substack published on Monday. Mary Trump, warned he is showing signs of dementia, took particular aim at the Trump administration’s National Security Strategy (NSS) document turned over to Congress — which, among other things, signals the administration won’t oppose Russian influence campaigns, won’t support Ukraine’s membership in to NATO, and generally won’t support the priorities of the EU going forward. “None of this should surprise us,” she wrote. “Donald and those in his orbit, including JD VanceMarco Rubio, Pete Hegseth, and every single congressional Republican, have shown themselves willing to turn the United States of America into an autocratic fascist regime in which white nationalism is the order of the day. But the implications are vast and far-reaching — not just a re-configuring of the post-World War II order, but a complete American withdrawal from it.”
Indeed, she continued, it’s perfectly natural Trump wouldn’t want to use American power to promote democracy as it has sought to do for decades: “Donald, from the perch of his imperial presidency — thanks to the corrupt illegitimate super majority of the Supreme Court — cares nothing for democratic values. So, therefore, with the Trump regime in charge of everything, neither does America. It is a terrible time for this country to abandon its role as leader and champion of global democracy; it is a terrible time for there to be such a leadership void during this crucial period in which autocracy is on the rise and democracy is on its back foot.”
Russian officials are celebrating this shift, Mary Trump warned, with Kremlin spokesman Dmitri Peskov saying of the NSS, “The adjustments we’re seeing … are largely consistent with our vision. We consider this a positive step.”
“Perhaps the most significant tell in the NSS is the description of a Europe that is on the brink of ‘civilizational erasure,’ a phrase that Carl Bildt, the former Swedish prime minister and foreign minister, says is ‘to the right of the extreme right,'” wrote Mary Trump. And this will have huge implications for the way Europe views America long after Trump is gone.
“The Trump regime is setting something else in motion, and it is something they may not be able to control,” she concluded. “It is certainly something we American voters will have no control over. We can get rid of Donald Trump and congressional Republicans and the Trump regime. We cannot un-ring the bell that has been rung by the Trump regime in Europe and elsewhere.”

Early Bets on Trump have failed

A deluge of Donald Trump-related investments made in the aftermath of his victory last November have now ended in disaster more than a year later.

“Sometimes irrational exuberance meets the brick wall of logic,” Art Hogan, chief market strategist at investment management platform B. Riley Wealth, told CNN in summing up the downward trend.

According to the network’s analysis, perhaps the most devastating market turn has been in the value of the president’s very own meme coin, $TRUMP.

 
Trump’s eponymous meme coin has declined by approximately 88 percent of its value since its launch in January.

The value of the digital asset, launched shortly before the MAGA leader assumed the presidency for the second time in January, initially rocketed up to $9 billion before steadily declining to $1.1 billion, representing a loss of 88 percent.

Investors in First Lady Melania Trump’s coin, MELANIA, will have suffered worse, with the crypto having faceplanted so spectacularly that the coin is now worth just 11 cents. Valued at just under $100 million, it’s down almost 99 percent on its value of $1.6 billion in February.

 
Even the president’s immigration crackdown has failed to yield the kind of gains ruthless investors might have expected to see in private prison stocks. 
 

Trump Media & Technology Group, which owns the president’s favored social media platform, Truth Social, has also apparently lost much of its appeal for traders.

They reportedly flocked to the firm, which has never turned a profit, in the weeks leading up to last year’s election, more than tripling its value to $11 billion.

But today, it’s worth less than $8 billion, representing an 80 percent decline.

Even among investments only tangentially related to Trump and his associates, the markets have reportedly not fared much better.

Investors were apparently hungry for shares in private prison companies in anticipation that the president’s promised anti-immigration crusade would bring a boom in their value.

 

Stocks in detention facility giant GEO Group, for instance, rocketed up by more than 175 percent in the days before Trump was sworn in. Since that time, however, they’ve lost more than half of that value.

“I’ve given up on private prisons,” Matthew Tuttle, chief investment officer at wealth management group Tuttle Capital Management, told CNN. “A lot of people, myself included, thought ICE would round up people and they would sit in private prisons.”

“I was not expecting sending people to El Salvador and other places,” he added.

Trump attacked director Rob Reiner, who died yesterday.
  • What happened: Trump responded to the death yesterday of Rob Reiner by suggesting Reiner and the Hollywood icon and his wife, Michele Singer Reiner, died because he was anti-Trump.
  • Backlash: Trump was criticized by figures across the political spectrum, including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia), who said the situation was “not about politics or political enemies,” and called for empathy.
  • It was Bob Reiner’s son who killed his parents, he had been in and out of care for addictions.

Trump et al are not patriots

In March, Hegseth’s Signal chat published US plans of attack in Yemen, including the exact time and location of the planned attack, which easily could have led to ambush or counter attacks costing American lives.

In June, Trump posted that the US knew where Iran’s enriched uranium was stockpiled, thus he gave Iran advanced warnings to move it before the bombing began, which Iran did.

Both Trump and Hegseth seriously jeopardized national security by releasing US military plans of attack in advance.

Hegseth has now replaced all credible media outlets with MAGA content creators, whom he welcomed to the Pentagon earlier this week for press briefings. These MAGA influencers, despite their lack of reporting or military beat experience, are the “new Pentagon press corps.” They include the My Pillow guy, nutjob Trump whisperer Laura Loomer, and Tim Pool, who was paid to produce videos for a company funded by the Russian government.

Trump is selling us out to our most sinister enemy

Many of us have long suspected or even predicted that Donald Trump would betray America, gut our democracy in favor of a police state, and align us with Russia. You know, the country that the Financial Times reported this week tried to launch multiple terrorist attacks against the United States and Europe over the past year.

We’re now there.

It’s the most under-reported story of the year, perhaps of the century: under Trump, the United States is abandoning advocacy of democracy (shutting down Voice of America, etc), abandoning our democratic allies in Europe, and for the past year has abandoned Ukraine to the tender mercies of the Butcher of Moscow.

At the same time, Trump’s building ties to Middle Eastern dictatorships, adopting Russia’s explicit worldview, trashing civil and human rights at home, and now handing to China our most valuable military-potential technology.

In other words, we’ve been betrayed by Donald Trump and the people around him in ways that would have made Benedict Arnold blush.

A few weeks ago, Trump presented Ukraine with a so-called “peace deal” that was apparently written, in first draft, by Moscow. This week, he told that nation they have “until Christmas” to hand over more than 20 percent of their country to Putin and surrender their own military abilities forever, leaving them vulnerable to Russia’s next attack.

Trump’s brain trust just produced a new National Security Strategy (NSS) for the United States that largely abandons Canada and Europe while embracing a racist, neofascist worldview straight out of Putin’s rhetoric.

As the National Security Desk writes:

“It abandons allies, misidentifies threats, emboldens aggressors, erodes deterrence, and even drives allies to consider nuclear proliferation.”

Alexander Vindman, the former Director of European Affairs for the United States National Security Council (NSC), wrote:

“The prevailing sentiment among European observers was that this document represented not only the closing chapter of decades’ worth of cooperation between the United States and Europe, but also that Washington may soon actively sabotage the political and economic systems of the European Union through the promotion of ‘patriotic parties’ and far-right figures. Amidst an ongoing impasse over a potential peace agreement in Ukraine, representatives of the Russian government claims that the document is ‘consistent with our vision.’”

David Rothkopf, a former senior national security/trade official in the Clinton administration, was equally blunt in an article published by the New Republic:

“Indeed, the document, released by the White House on Thursday, reads as if it were dictated by the Kremlin, much as our recent ‘peace proposal’ for Ukraine turned out to have been. Or, perhaps more accurately, it reads like the product of a collaboration between Vladimir Putin and Stephen Miller, the deputy White House chief of staff for nativist hate.”

Russia expert Olga Lautman called it “Russia’s return on investment for interfering in the 2016 election,” and it sure looks like she’s right. An earlier article by her titled “America’s Foreign Policy Now Aligns With Russia” noted:

“The NSS does not merely ‘shift priorities.’ It flips seventy-five years of American policy on its head and declares political war on Europe’s democratic institutions while elevating the far-right parties in Europe that Russia has been cultivating for more than a decade. Trump’s team packaged this as a vision for a ‘new’ transatlantic relationship, but the core message is unmistakable, and that is to weaken NATO, fracture Europe, isolate Ukraine, and empower nationalist movements that are openly friendly to Moscow, with every paragraph carrying the same cold, transactional, subservient logic that has defined Trump’s relationship with Russia for decades.”

Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman, rarely one to engage in hyperbole, wrote of this document in an article titled “Is This the End of the Free World?”:

“The language is astonishing. Europe, the document warns, faces ‘the stark prospect of civilizational erasure.’ Why? Because ‘it is more than plausible that within a few decades at the latest, certain NATO members will become majority non-European.’ I don’t know why they bothered with the euphemism: ‘non-European’ clearly means ‘nonwhite.’“But there’s hope, the document declares, thanks to ‘the growing influence of patriotic European parties,’ by which it clearly means parties like Germany’s neo-Nazi AfD.”

Meanwhile, Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea are working together to destroy Ukraine, the gateway to Europe, and fielding armies of bots to fill social media and other venues with pro-Trump and anti-democracy rhetoric.

And the world’s richest man and recipient in billions in American government contracts, Elon Musk, the architect of the destruction of America’s soft power via USAID, this week called for the abolition of the European Union itself.

Finally, to the shock of the western world, Trump “cut a deal” to let Nvidia sell some of their most advanced chips to China after our military and intelligence experts have explicitly warned of the danger that this could accelerate that country’s move toward seizing Taiwan and threatening us with World War III.

Add to that Trump’s bellicose and murderous actions against Venezuela that could lead to us engaging in warfare in our own hemisphere, and you have the formula to tie up our military while bringing about the final end of American influence in the larger world, exactly as Putin and Xi want.

NATO chief Mark Rutte yesterday urged the West to prepare for war “like our grandparents endured,” adding:

“Conflict is at our door. Russia has brought war back to Europe. And we must be prepared.”

Trump could use such a war — as has been done before by presidents Wilson and Roosevelt — to gut civil rights in America and imprison the people he sees as his “threats” or political enemies.

And try to call off or steal the elections of 2026.

These developments, combined with the naked brutality of ICE that was revealed by this week’s report from Amnesty International, are shocking. American democracy is being gutted from within, our foreign policy is realigning away from Europe and toward Russia and China, all while dictators and corporate oligarchs openly bribe Trump and members of his family.

Where is our media? Where is the GOP? Democratic politicians are speaking out, as are some commentators, but elected Republicans and the majority of the corporate media are “business as usual.”

This is a five-alarm fire for democracy, both here and around the world.

We are officially in a POLICE STATE

In a bizarre directive that could have been written by the staff of The Onion, or Putin’s secret police, or Evangelical Christians, that is  National Security Presidential Memorandum-7 (NSPM-7), Donald Trump ordered the FBI, DOJ, and more than 200 federal Joint Terrorism Task Forces (coordinating FBI with local police forces across the country) to seek out and investigate any person or group who meet it’s “indica” (indicators) of potential domestic terrorism.

They include,

“[A]nti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, anti-Christianity … extremism on migration, extremism on race, extremism on gender, hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family, hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on religion, and hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on morality.”

  • Have you ever spoken ill of our country or its policies, particularly under Trump?
  • Trash-talked capitalism  on social media?
  • Publicly questioned Christianity or professed loyalty to Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Paganism, or any other non-Christian belief system or religion?
  • Embraced the trans or more general queer community?
  • Spoken out in defense of single-parenting, gay marriage, or same-sex couples adopting children?
  • Said things or carried a sign that might hurt the feelings of masked ICE agents, Trump, or Kristi Noem?

Just imagining that any of these could trigger FBI agents knocking on our doors was so grotesque a notion that when the story first appeared four months ago, it was reported and then largely dismissed by mainstream media within the same day.

Now, in a second bombshell report, Klippenstein has obtained and published a copy of Attorney General Pam Bondi’s Dec. 4 memo ordering the FBI to actually begin Russia-style investigations of people and groups who fit into the categories listed above.

Not only that, Bondi also ordered the FBI to go back as far as five years in their investigations of our social media posts, protest attendance, and other activities to find evidence of our possible adherence to these now-forbidden views.

Just being anti-fascist is, in Bondi’s eyes, apparently now a crime in America. From her memo to the FBI:

“Further, this [anti-fascist] ideology that paints legitimate government authority and traditional, conservative viewpoints as ‘fascist’ connects a recent string of political violence. Carvings on the bullet casings of Charlie Kirk’s assassin’s bullets read, ‘Hey, fascist, catch’ and ‘Bella Ciao’ — an ode to antifascist movements in Italy. … ICE agents are regularly doxed by anti-fascists, and calls to dox ICE agents appear in the same sentence of opinion pieces calling the Trump Administration fascist.”

At the same time, ICE is using a chunk of the massive budget the Big Ugly Bill gave them — larger than the budget of the FBI or any other police agency in America (or, probably, any other police agency in the world outside of China and Russia) — to buy tools they can use to spy on “anti-fascist” people who protest or oppose their actions.

In a report titled “ICE Wants to Go After Dissenters as well as Immigrants,” the Brennan Center for Justice details how the agency has acquired “a smorgasbord of spy technology: social media monitoring systems, cellphone location tracking, facial recognition, remote hacking tools, and more.”

They’ve reportedly acquired devices that spoof cellphone towers, so if you’re near them your phone will connect, thinking it’s talking to your cell carrier. Once the connection is established, ICE and/or DHS can monitor every communication to or from your phone and possibly even download all the content on your phone including emails, pictures, apps, and your browsing history.

They’re tying into nationwide networks of license-plate readers, airport facial recognition systems, and using federal surveillance drones to monitor people they consider enemies of the agency. And they’re carefully combing your social media content for posts, likes, and reposts they consider objectionable. As the Brennan Center noted:

“Homeland Security Investigations recently signed a multimillion dollar contract for a social media monitoring platform called Zignal Labs that claims to ingest and analyze more than 8 billion posts a day. The agency is also paying millions to Penlink for monitoring tools that gather information from multiple sources, including social media platforms, the dark web, and databases of location data.”

ICE is also acquiring Russian-style spy software that can remotely target your phone without your realizing it, infect it with the equivalent of an “ICE virus,” and then have your phone send them everything you do, say, hear, or see on an ongoing basis for months.

The only clue you’ll have will probably be that your battery life seems to have dropped as your phone is pumping out to ICE your data and everything the microphone in it picks up, all without your knowledge or permission.

This Putin-style sort of “search” without a legal warrant is the sort of thing that King George III’s officers did against the colonists (although back then it was reading their mail, spying on them in person, and kicking in their doors) in the 1770s that provoked our nation’s Founders to write in the Fourth Amendment to our Constitution:

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

It’s also a clear violation of the First Amendment’s protection of our rights to “free speech” and “peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

When Putin ended democracy in Russia, he defined the people who protested his policies as domestic terrorists and had his secret police go after them in ways that are shockingly similar to what ICE is launching and Bondi is ordering the FBI to do.

It’s chillingly un-American.


How do people find Trump good?

Members of my family are Evangelical Christians; in fact, they’re part of the Quiverfull cult. They love, love, love Donald Trump. They look at him as a second Messiah.

Why?

Because he says he is.

This is really, really hard for non-Evangelicals to wrap their heads around, but for a lot of Evangelicals, what you say is far, far more important than what you do.

Let’s start with this:

You will never, ever, ever shame or persuade an Evangelical by pointing to someone’s behavior and saying “that’s not very Christian, is it?” They’re equipped with a magical defense against that, one phrase in the Bible that’s the perfect counter to any behavior no matter how reprehensible:

“All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.”

Romans 3:23.

 

Donald Trump cheated a cancer charity? All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. Donald Trump cleared out a street full of protesters with tear gas? All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.

Donald Trump persecutes and kills immigrants? Well, they like that part, it’s one of the things they voted for. It’s hard to find a more racist bunch than American Evangelicals. The Ku Klux Klan, the White Aryan Resistance, the Aryan Nations, and the various Christian Identity churches all consider themselves Evangelical Christians.

Anyway, that phrase, “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of god,” is like the soldier in that meme standing guard over anything that would shatter their worship of Trump.

Evangelism is authoritarian. Evangelicals are taught never to question people they see as being in legitimate authority, which includes their own leaders. That’s deliberate; Evangelical leaders tend to have sex with children, with the wives of their own flock, and with sex workers, tend to embezzle from their flock, and tend to do all sorts of other reprehensible things…but Evangelicals like my family shrug and say “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.”

My parents (my father was a deacon) found that the youth pastor was having sex with the children in the church.When they told the pastor and the other deacons, it was my parents that were evicted from the church, not the youth pastor. It was not until it became a police matter that the youth pastor left, he never was punished however, because he was “doing the Lord’s work”.

So “Donald Trump is a bad person who does bad things” will never ever ever work. They know. They don’t care.

So why do they love him?

To understand that, you have to understand something deeply ingrained in American Evangelicals, something non-Evangelicals also have trouble getting their heads around:

Spiritual warfare.

 

To an Evangelical, spiritual warfare is not a metaphor.

Let me say that again because it’s that important: spiritual warfare is not a metaphor.

They literally believe that the entire earth is currently a battleground, that right now in the room you are sitting in the literal army of God is conducting literal war with the literal army of Satan, that this is a direct war with swords and shields and magical weapons, and the fact you can’t see it doesn’t mean it’s not real.

They believe that Trump is standing beside them protecting them. They believe every doubt (or question about the truth of what they’re taught) comes from a literal demon standing physically right next to them whispering Satan’s words in their ear.

The rules of engagement in this war say that the armies of Satan cannot harm the faithful without their consent, but they can whisper propaganda. Every little twinge of doubt they feel, every little wobble in their faith in their leaders and Donald Trump: “Watch out, Brother, that’s Satan whispering in your ear. If you listen to him, you are lost.”

To understand that, imagine a real, actual war, like say WWII.

Remember this guy?

 

Winston Churchill was a drunk and a womanizer, but he also led the British to victory.

Evangelicals believe that God can use anyone, anyone, and that person can rise up to be a powerful commander of the armies of God.

Imagine you’re in 1944 Britain and someone tells you, “We should get rid of Churchill because he drinks.”

You’d think he was daft.

Yeah, he drinks, he’s famous for it. Yeah, he has problems with women. So what? Ir’s a war. He’s winning battles.

That’s how Evangelicals feel about Donald Trump.

Is he a womanizer? Yes. Is he a cheat? Yes. Is he problematic? Yes.

All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.

God can use anyone in His righteous quest and God is using Donald Trump.

Donald Trump is winning battles. He won against the forces of Satan by making abortion illegal. He’s winning against the forces of Satan by making gay men, lesbians, and trans people suffer. He won the battle against DEI. He’s talking about making gay marriage illegal again, the single greatest battle Satan decisively won in recent memory.

You don’t replace your commander in the middle of a war when he’s winning battle after battle because you don’t like the things he does with women.

They don’t have to like him personally to see him as a commander of the armies of God, routing the legions of Hell and their Earthly supporters: the gays, the trans, the liberals, the Muslims, the non-Christians.

A thing my family says: “Sure, I would never invite him to dinner, but so what? He’s doing God’s work.”